EQRRvsRECSETF Comparison
VS
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. EQRR's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Energy and Finance. In contrast, RECS's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. EQRR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.15% for RECS. EQRR is up 26.87% year-to-date (YTD) with +$12M in YTD flows. RECS performs worse with 8.35% YTD performance, and +$679M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EQRR and RECS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EQRR vs RECS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EQRR RECS | +1.04%+2.83% | +11.56%+5.00% | +26.87%+8.35% | +36.28%+19.46% | +70.08%+73.95% | +100.14%+94.98% |
| Flows | EQRR RECS | -$22M+$38M | -$12M+$236M | +$12M+$679M | +$13M+$2.01B | -$18M+$4.48B | +$22M+$4.68B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EQRR RECS | +18.27%+10.64% | +15.03%+12.00% | +16.08%+14.55% | +20.15%+16.59% |
| Max drawdown | EQRR RECS | -3.56%-3.45% | -4.94%-8.79% | -17.65%-18.49% | -21.78%-22.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | EQRR RECS | 32d34d | 15d66d | 236d126d | 156d573d |
Trading data
EQRR | RECS | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $81.20 | $44.23 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $81.16 | $44.65 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EQRR | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EQRR | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $81.20 | $44.23 |
| 1D performance | +0.05% | -0.94% |
| AuM | $32.46 M | $5.90 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
EQRR | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq US Large Cap Equities for Rising Rates Index | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 867 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 24, 2017 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EQRR
USA
99.66%
Other
0.34%
RECS
USA
97.35%
Other
2.65%
Sectors
EQRR
Technology
36.41%
Energy
24.88%
Finance
19.01%
Consumer Services
7.02%
Other
12.68%
RECS
Technology
41.56%
Finance
14.34%
Healthcare
8.18%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.59%
Other
28.33%
Advertisement
Diversification
EQRR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.66%
RECS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.25%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
EQRR
Marvell Technology, Inc.
4.47%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
3.88%
Lam Research Corp.
3.12%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.02%
Synopsys, Inc.
2.97%
Zscaler, Inc.
2.96%
KLA Corp.
2.83%
HP, Inc.
2.80%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.77%
Applied Materials, Inc.
2.76%
Baker Hughes Co.
2.71%
Halliburton Co.
2.66%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
2.62%
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
2.58%
Valero Energy Corp.
2.52%
RECS
NVIDIA Corp.
9.53%
Apple, Inc.
9.07%
Microsoft Corp.
4.84%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.29%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.67%
Procter & Gamble Co.
2.18%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.91%
Wells Fargo & Co.
1.66%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.65%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
1.62%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.60%
Morgan Stanley
1.59%
Booking Holdings, Inc.
1.46%
Lam Research Corp.
1.13%
Pfizer Inc.
1.07%
Frequently asked questions about EQRR and RECS
How have the EQRR and RECS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, EQRR is up 26.87% year-to-date (YTD), while RECS has returned 8.35%. That puts EQRR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EQRR or RECS?
Year-to-date, the EQRR ETF saw +$12M in flows, compared to +$679M for RECS.
Which ETF is more volatile: EQRR or RECS?
Over the past year, EQRR had a volatility of 15.03%, while RECS experienced 12%.
Which ETF is bigger: EQRR or RECS?
As of July 17, 2026, EQRR holds $32.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while RECS manages $5.90 B.
What sectors do the EQRR and RECS ETFs invest in?
EQRR leans toward sectors like Technology, Energy and Finance. Meanwhile, RECS focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the EQRR ETF and RECS ETF?
EQRR top holdings include Marvell Technology, Inc., CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Lam Research Corp.. RECS holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: EQRR or RECS?
EQRR holds 50 securities with 44.66% of its assets in the top 15. RECS has 876 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.25%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
