EQRRvsFNDXETF Comparison
VS
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF (FNDX) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. EQRR's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Technology and Finance. In contrast, FNDX's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. EQRR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.25% for FNDX. EQRR is up 33.33% year-to-date (YTD) with +$19M in YTD flows. FNDX performs worse with 20.84% YTD performance, and +$1.58B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EQRR and FNDX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EQRR vs FNDX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EQRR FNDX | -1.14%+1.88% | +5.08%+3.20% | +33.33%+20.84% | +40.33%+26.80% | +77.73%+82.05% | +83.12%+90.63% |
| Flows | EQRR FNDX | +$7M+$312M | +$7M+$908M | +$19M+$1.58B | +$22M+$2.25B | -$2M+$5.98B | +$29M+$9.73B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EQRR FNDX | +12.74%+8.21% | +15.14%+10.05% | +15.89%+13.05% | +19.82%+15.04% |
| Max drawdown | EQRR FNDX | -4.41%-3.68% | -4.94%-6.11% | -17.65%-16.26% | -21.78%-18.97% |
| Max drawdown duration | EQRR FNDX | 31d43d | 15d63d | 236d131d | 156d545d |
Trading data
EQRR | FNDX | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $85.07 | $32.52 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $85.69 | $32.58 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EQRR | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EQRR | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $85.07 | $32.52 |
| 1D performance | -0.73% | -0.18% |
| AuM | $40.84 M | $28.16 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
EQRR | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq US Large Cap Equities for Rising Rates Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 706 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 24, 2017 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EQRR
USA
99.77%
Other
0.23%
FNDX
USA
97.59%
Other
2.41%
Sectors
EQRR
Energy
31.68%
Technology
26.98%
Finance
20.77%
Telecommunication.
8.67%
Other
11.9%
FNDX
Technology
23.26%
Finance
16.86%
Healthcare
12.93%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.61%
Energy
10.34%
Industrials
7.39%
Other
18.62%
Advertisement
Diversification
EQRR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.91%
FNDX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.47%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
EQRR
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
3.78%
Valero Energy Corp.
3.55%
ConocoPhillips
3.37%
Chevron Corp.
3.16%
Occidental Petroleum Corp.
3.16%
Devon Energy Corp.
3.01%
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
3.01%
EOG Resources, Inc.
3.00%
Baker Hughes Co.
2.96%
HP, Inc.
2.91%
Zscaler, Inc.
2.87%
Halliburton Co.
2.67%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
2.52%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.50%
LPL Financial Holdings, Inc.
2.43%
FNDX
Apple, Inc.
4.51%
Microsoft Corp.
2.84%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.50%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.87%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.86%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.69%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.65%
Chevron Corp.
1.62%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.53%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.50%
Intel Corp.
1.44%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.24%
Johnson & Johnson
1.12%
Bank of America Corp.
1.06%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
1.05%
Frequently asked questions about EQRR and FNDX
How have the EQRR and FNDX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, EQRR is up 33.33% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDX has returned 20.84%. That puts EQRR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EQRR or FNDX?
Year-to-date, the EQRR ETF saw +$19M in flows, compared to +$1.58B for FNDX.
Which ETF is more volatile: EQRR or FNDX?
Over the past year, EQRR had a volatility of 15.14%, while FNDX experienced 10.05%.
Which ETF is bigger: EQRR or FNDX?
As of October 16, 2026, EQRR holds $40.84 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNDX manages $28.16 B.
What sectors do the EQRR and FNDX ETFs invest in?
EQRR leans toward sectors like Energy, Technology and Finance. Meanwhile, FNDX focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the EQRR ETF and FNDX ETF?
EQRR top holdings include Marathon Petroleum Corp., Valero Energy Corp. and ConocoPhillips. FNDX holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp. and ExxonMobil Holdings Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: EQRR or FNDX?
EQRR holds 50 securities with 44.91% of its assets in the top 15. FNDX has 707 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.47%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
