Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EQLTvsDBEMETF Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. EQLT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.66% for DBEM. EQLT is up 4.4% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. DBEM performs better with 8.74% YTD performance, and +$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EQLT and DBEM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EQLT vs DBEM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EQLT DBEM | -4.99%-2.01% | +6.75%+10.58% | +4.40%+8.74% | +35.07%+37.83% | n/a+72.09% | n/a+32.89% |
| Flows | EQLT DBEM | -+$4M | -+$4M | -+$4M | --$5M | --$36M | --$35M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EQLT DBEM | +20.34%+18.00% | +16.71%+15.37% | n/a+13.12% | n/a+13.99% |
| Max drawdown | EQLT DBEM | -8.56%-8.20% | -13.07%-12.13% | n/a-13.24% | n/a-31.19% |
| Max drawdown duration | EQLT DBEM | 15d13d | 43d56d | n/a242d | n/a1439d |
EQLT | DBEM | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.63 | $34.12 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $31.85 | $34.05 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EQLT | DBEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EQLT | DBEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.63 | $34.12 |
| 1D performance | -0.70% | +0.21% |
| AuM | $10.15 M | $89.09 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.66% |
EQLT | DBEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor Select Index | MSCI Emerging Markets Index |
| N° of holdings | 289 | 1039 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 4, 2024 | June 8, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EQLT and DBEM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, EQLT is up 4.4% year-to-date (YTD), while DBEM has returned 8.74%. That puts DBEM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EQLT or DBEM?
Year-to-date, the EQLT ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$4M for DBEM.
Which ETF is more volatile: EQLT or DBEM?
Over the past year, EQLT had a volatility of 16.71%, while DBEM experienced 15.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: EQLT or DBEM?
As of March 12, 2026, EQLT holds $10.15 M in assets under management (AUM), while DBEM manages $89.09 M.
What sectors do the EQLT and DBEM ETFs invest in?
EQLT leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, DBEM focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the EQLT ETF and DBEM ETF?
EQLT top holdings include SAMSUNG ELECTR, SK HYNIX and ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD. DBEM holds in its top three: TWN SEMICONT MAN, SAMSUNG ELECTR and TENCENT HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: EQLT or DBEM?
EQLT holds 313 securities with 42.73% of its assets in the top 15. DBEM has 1146 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.47%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
