Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EMXCvsFNDEETF Comparison
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. EMXC's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Materials. In contrast, FNDE's top sector exposures are Financials, Materials and Energy. EMXC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.39% for FNDE. EMXC is up 12.1% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.57B in YTD flows. FNDE performs worse with 7.16% YTD performance, and +$252M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EMXC and FNDE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EMXC vs FNDE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EMXC FNDE | -3.08%-3.50% | +14.77%+8.82% | +12.10%+7.16% | +53.81%+31.45% | +83.83%+74.48% | +54.51%+63.93% |
| Flows | EMXC FNDE | +$622M+$92M | +$1.79B+$525M | +$1.57B+$252M | -$3.68B+$778M | +$7.62B+$1.66B | +$11.01B+$3.19B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EMXC FNDE | +20.98%+14.73% | +16.60%+14.88% | +14.00%+14.01% | +14.40%+14.71% |
| Max drawdown | EMXC FNDE | -9.76%-7.09% | -10.84%-14.37% | -17.95%-15.44% | -28.25%-29.29% |
| Max drawdown duration | EMXC FNDE | 14d14d | 35d56d | 256d245d | 898d824d |
EMXC | FNDE | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $78.24 | $37.93 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $81.35 | $38.57 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EMXC | FNDE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EMXC | FNDE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $78.24 | $37.93 |
| 1D performance | -3.82% | -1.67% |
| AuM | $16.87 B | $9.02 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.39% |
EMXC | FNDE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index |
| N° of holdings | 581 | 285 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 18, 2017 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EMXC and FNDE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, EMXC is up 12.1% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDE has returned 7.16%. That puts EMXC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EMXC or FNDE?
Year-to-date, the EMXC ETF saw +$1.57B in flows, compared to +$252M for FNDE.
Which ETF is more volatile: EMXC or FNDE?
Over the past year, EMXC had a volatility of 16.6%, while FNDE experienced 14.88%.
Which ETF is bigger: EMXC or FNDE?
As of March 11, 2026, EMXC holds $16.87 B in assets under management (AUM), while FNDE manages $9.02 B.
What sectors do the EMXC and FNDE ETFs invest in?
EMXC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Materials. Meanwhile, FNDE focuses on Financials, Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the EMXC ETF and FNDE ETF?
EMXC top holdings include TWN SEMICONT MAN, SAMSUNG ELECTR and SK HYNIX. FNDE holds in its top three: TWN SEMICONT MAN, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and VALE SA.
Which ETF is more diversified: EMXC or FNDE?
EMXC holds 639 securities with 38.36% of its assets in the top 15. FNDE has 317 securities and a top 15 weight of 31.95%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.