EMOPvsGEMETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
GEM
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
This fund is part of
EM Large & Mid Cap
-1.26%
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) is part of the EM Large & Mid Cap segment. EMOP's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Energy. In contrast, GEM's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Non-Energy Materials. EMOP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.59% for GEM. EMOP is up 19.78% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.80B in YTD flows. GEM performs worse with 17.1% YTD performance, and +$283M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EMOP and GEM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EMOP vs GEM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EMOP GEM | -3.26%-3.80% | -1.84%-1.98% | +19.78%+17.10% | +22.31%+19.90% | n/a+78.84% | n/a+44.01% |
| Flows | EMOP GEM | +$23M- | +$45M+$46M | +$1.80B+$283M | +$1.82B+$314M | -+$196M | -+$65M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EMOP GEM | +20.77%+22.13% | +20.62%+23.21% | n/a+17.52% | n/a+16.74% |
| Max drawdown | EMOP GEM | -7.63%-7.90% | -13.27%-13.50% | n/a-14.73% | n/a-31.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | EMOP GEM | 10d37d | 58d57d | n/a223d | n/a1301d |
Trading data
EMOP | GEM | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.37 | $48.02 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $48.73 | $48.91 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EMOP
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexEMOP | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EMOP | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.37 | $48.02 |
| 1D performance | -0.74% | -1.82% |
| AuM | $2.04 B | $1.68 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
EMOP | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AllianceBernstein | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 54 | 718 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 18, 2025 | September 25, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
EMOP
Taiwan
25.6%
Republic of Korea
22.49%
China
18%
Other
33.91%
GEM
Taiwan
24.08%
Republic of Korea
18.43%
China
17.83%
India
9.88%
Other
29.78%
Sectors
EMOP
Technology
47.15%
Finance
20.99%
Energy
7.62%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.23%
Other
17.02%
GEM
Technology
40.28%
Finance
19.88%
Other
39.85%
Advertisement
Diversification
EMOP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
65.3%
GEM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
35.34%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
EMOP
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
17.83%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
9.72%
SK hynix, Inc.
5.83%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
3.29%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
3.03%
Petróleo Brasileiro SA
2.91%
Kia Corp.
2.77%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
2.66%
China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.
2.66%
ORLEN SA
2.63%
Fomento Economico Mexicano SAB de CV
2.60%
Grupo Financiero Banorte SAB de CV
2.58%
Lenovo Group Ltd.
2.31%
Colgate-Palmolive Co.
2.24%
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd.
2.24%
GEM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
13.94%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
6.54%
SK hynix, Inc.
4.36%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
2.59%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
1.68%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.32%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
0.84%
China Construction Bank Corp.
0.74%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
0.67%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
0.47%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
0.47%
HDFC Bank Ltd.
0.47%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
0.46%
King Slide Works Co., Ltd.
0.39%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
0.39%
Frequently asked questions about EMOP and GEM
How have the EMOP and GEM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, EMOP is up 19.78% year-to-date (YTD), while GEM has returned 17.1%. That puts EMOP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EMOP or GEM?
Year-to-date, the EMOP ETF saw +$1.80B in flows, compared to +$283M for GEM.
Which ETF is more volatile: EMOP or GEM?
Over the past year, EMOP had a volatility of 20.62%, while GEM experienced 23.21%.
Which ETF is bigger: EMOP or GEM?
As of October 16, 2026, EMOP holds $2.04 B in assets under management (AUM), while GEM manages $1.68 B.
What sectors do the EMOP and GEM ETFs invest in?
EMOP leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Energy. Meanwhile, GEM focuses on Technology and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the EMOP ETF and GEM ETF?
EMOP top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc.. GEM holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: EMOP or GEM?
EMOP holds 56 securities with 65.3% of its assets in the top 15. GEM has 740 securities and a top 15 weight of 35.34%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
