EMOPvsEMGFETF Comparison
VS
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF (EMGF) is part of the EM Large & Mid Cap segment. EMOP's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Energy. In contrast, EMGF's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. EMOP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.26% for EMGF. EMOP is up 19.78% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.80B in YTD flows. EMGF performs worse with 17.1% YTD performance, and +$292M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EMOP and EMGF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EMOP vs EMGF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EMOP EMGF | -3.26%-4.64% | -1.84%-2.46% | +19.78%+17.10% | +22.31%+19.87% | n/a+83.18% | n/a+54.46% |
| Flows | EMOP EMGF | +$23M- | +$45M+$29M | +$1.80B+$292M | +$1.82B+$343M | -+$735M | -+$784M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EMOP EMGF | +20.77%+21.00% | +20.62%+22.89% | n/a+17.59% | n/a+16.82% |
| Max drawdown | EMOP EMGF | -7.63%-9.12% | -13.27%-14.42% | n/a-16.15% | n/a-26.61% |
| Max drawdown duration | EMOP EMGF | 10d24d | 58d116d | n/a220d | n/a902d |
Trading data
EMOP | EMGF | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.37 | $67.39 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $48.73 | $68.54 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EMOP
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexEMOP | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EMOP | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.37 | $67.39 |
| 1D performance | -0.74% | -1.69% |
| AuM | $2.04 B | $1.82 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.26% |
Characteristics
EMOP | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AllianceBernstein | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | STOXX Emerging Markets Equity Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 54 | 654 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 18, 2025 | December 8, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EMOP
Taiwan
25.6%
Republic of Korea
22.49%
China
18%
Other
33.91%
EMGF
Taiwan
25.59%
China
20.53%
Republic of Korea
20.45%
India
12.33%
Other
21.1%
Sectors
EMOP
Technology
47.15%
Finance
20.99%
Energy
7.62%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.23%
Other
17.02%
EMGF
Technology
41.04%
Finance
21.08%
Industrials
7.52%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.08%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.05%
Other
16.23%
Advertisement
Diversification
EMOP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
65.3%
EMGF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.22%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
EMOP
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
17.83%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
9.72%
SK hynix, Inc.
5.83%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
3.29%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
3.03%
Petróleo Brasileiro SA
2.91%
Kia Corp.
2.77%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
2.66%
China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.
2.66%
ORLEN SA
2.63%
Fomento Economico Mexicano SAB de CV
2.60%
Grupo Financiero Banorte SAB de CV
2.58%
Lenovo Group Ltd.
2.31%
Colgate-Palmolive Co.
2.24%
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd.
2.24%
EMGF
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
10.31%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
6.80%
SK hynix, Inc.
4.51%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
2.72%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
1.96%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.50%
China Construction Bank Corp.
1.02%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
1.00%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
0.76%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
0.66%
SK Square Co. Ltd.
0.65%
Bank of China Ltd.
0.62%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
0.61%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
0.56%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
0.55%
Frequently asked questions about EMOP and EMGF
How have the EMOP and EMGF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, EMOP is up 19.78% year-to-date (YTD), while EMGF has returned 17.1%. That puts EMOP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EMOP or EMGF?
Year-to-date, the EMOP ETF saw +$1.80B in flows, compared to +$292M for EMGF.
Which ETF is more volatile: EMOP or EMGF?
Over the past year, EMOP had a volatility of 20.62%, while EMGF experienced 22.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: EMOP or EMGF?
As of October 16, 2026, EMOP holds $2.04 B in assets under management (AUM), while EMGF manages $1.82 B.
What sectors do the EMOP and EMGF ETFs invest in?
EMOP leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Energy. Meanwhile, EMGF focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the EMOP ETF and EMGF ETF?
EMOP top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc.. EMGF holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: EMOP or EMGF?
EMOP holds 56 securities with 65.3% of its assets in the top 15. EMGF has 671 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.22%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
