EMIFvsCNQQETF Comparison
VS
iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) and Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ) belong to the same industry segment: EM Awakening. EMIF's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Energy. In contrast, CNQQ's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. EMIF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.75% for CNQQ. EMIF is down -0.17% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6M in YTD flows. CNQQ performs worse with -21.14% YTD performance, and +$33M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EMIF and CNQQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EMIF vs CNQQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EMIF CNQQ | -1.54%-15.74% | -2.02%-20.99% | -0.17%-21.14% | +4.09%-25.91% | +51.52%n/a | +27.61%n/a |
| Flows | EMIF CNQQ | --$3M | --$3M | +$6M+$33M | +$6M+$41M | -$9M- | -$1M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EMIF CNQQ | +15.21%+24.22% | +15.82%+26.35% | +15.09%n/a | +16.65%n/a |
| Max drawdown | EMIF CNQQ | -6.94%-26.07% | -16.30%-31.40% | -16.30%n/a | -23.25%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | EMIF CNQQ | 19d74d | 250d122d | 250dn/a | 964dn/a |
Trading data
EMIF | CNQQ | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.04 | $18.16 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $25.98 | $18.55 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EMIF | CNQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EMIF | CNQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.04 | $18.16 |
| 1D performance | +0.23% | -2.12% |
| AuM | $13.03 M | $34.65 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
EMIF | CNQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Rayliant Asset Management |
| Benchmark | S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index | Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech Index |
| N° of holdings | 31 | 100 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 16, 2009 | September 25, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
EMIF
China
22.8%
Brazil
19.92%
Mexico
17.89%
Hong Kong
13.69%
Thailand
8.63%
Other
17.07%
CNQQ
China
99.14%
Other
0.86%
Sectors
EMIF
Industrials
39.57%
Utilities
38.6%
Energy
21.13%
Other
0.7%
CNQQ
Technology
56.97%
Industrials
13.49%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.38%
Healthcare
8.17%
Other
10.99%
Diversification
EMIF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
75.4%
CNQQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
53%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
EMIF
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico SAB de CV
9.43%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
9.07%
Airports of Thailand Public Co. Ltd.
8.63%
ADNOC Drilling Co. PJSC
6.08%
Qatar Gas Transport Co.
4.61%
Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste SA de CV
4.58%
COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation Co., Ltd.
4.54%
Companhia Paranaense de Energia
4.28%
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
3.96%
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte SAB de CV
3.88%
Motiva Infraestrutura de Mobilidade SA
3.65%
Korea Electric Power Corp.
3.48%
ENN Energy Holdings Ltd.
3.27%
CGN Power Co., Ltd.
3.02%
Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais SA
2.92%
CNQQ
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
8.88%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
8.67%
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
5.88%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
5.35%
Xiaomi Corp.
3.28%
Meituan
2.92%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
2.63%
NetEase, Inc.
2.52%
Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.
2.18%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
1.99%
Advanced Micro Fabrication Equipment, Inc. China
1.84%
GigaDevice Semiconductor, Inc.
1.82%
Montage Technology Co., Ltd.
1.70%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.68%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
1.65%
Frequently asked questions about EMIF and CNQQ
How have the EMIF and CNQQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, EMIF is down -0.17% year-to-date (YTD), while CNQQ has lost -21.14%. That puts EMIF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EMIF or CNQQ?
Year-to-date, the EMIF ETF saw +$6M in flows, compared to +$33M for CNQQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: EMIF or CNQQ?
Over the past year, EMIF had a volatility of 15.82%, while CNQQ experienced 26.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: EMIF or CNQQ?
As of October 30, 2026, EMIF holds $13.03 M in assets under management (AUM), while CNQQ manages $34.65 M.
What sectors do the EMIF and CNQQ ETFs invest in?
EMIF leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Energy. Meanwhile, CNQQ focuses on Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the EMIF ETF and CNQQ ETF?
EMIF top holdings include Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico SAB de CV, Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP and Airports of Thailand Public Co. Ltd.. CNQQ holds in its top three: Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., Tencent Holdings Ltd. and Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: EMIF or CNQQ?
EMIF holds 31 securities with 75.4% of its assets in the top 15. CNQQ has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 53%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
