EMGFvsGEMETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
GEM
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
This fund is part of
EM Large & Mid Cap
+2.01%
iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF (EMGF) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. EMGF's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, GEM's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Non-Energy Materials. EMGF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.26%, versus 0.59% for GEM. EMGF is up 19.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$305M in YTD flows. GEM performs worse with 16.2% YTD performance, and +$312M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EMGF and GEM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EMGF vs GEM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EMGF GEM | -4.88%-5.77% | +2.73%+1.95% | +19.02%+16.20% | +18.90%+17.18% | +92.18%+81.85% | +59.04%+43.64% |
| Flows | EMGF GEM | +$13M+$28M | +$42M+$52M | +$305M+$312M | +$356M+$343M | +$756M+$224M | +$798M+$93M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EMGF GEM | +20.28%+20.25% | +23.15%+23.32% | +17.70%+17.60% | +16.89%+16.80% |
| Max drawdown | EMGF GEM | -10.70%-10.29% | -14.42%-13.50% | -16.15%-14.73% | -26.61%-30.83% |
| Max drawdown duration | EMGF GEM | 36d49d | 128d57d | 220d223d | 902d993d |
Trading data
EMGF | GEM | |
Last sale 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $67.52 | $47.95 |
| Previous close 10/28/2026 | $68.19 | $48.58 |
| Consolidated volume 10/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EMGF | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EMGF | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $67.52 | $47.95 |
| 1D performance | -0.99% | -1.30% |
| AuM | $1.86 B | $1.69 B |
| E/R | 0.26% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
EMGF | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | STOXX Emerging Markets Equity Factor Index | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 654 | 697 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 8, 2015 | September 25, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EMGF
Taiwan
25.59%
China
20.53%
Republic of Korea
20.45%
India
12.33%
Other
21.1%
GEM
Taiwan
24.08%
Republic of Korea
18.43%
China
17.83%
India
9.88%
Other
29.78%
Sectors
EMGF
Technology
41.04%
Finance
21.08%
Industrials
7.52%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.08%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.05%
Other
16.23%
GEM
Technology
40.28%
Finance
19.88%
Other
39.85%
Advertisement
Diversification
EMGF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.22%
GEM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
35.49%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
EMGF
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
10.31%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
6.80%
SK hynix, Inc.
4.51%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
2.72%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
1.96%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.50%
China Construction Bank Corp.
1.02%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
1.00%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
0.76%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
0.66%
SK Square Co. Ltd.
0.65%
Bank of China Ltd.
0.62%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
0.61%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
0.56%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
0.55%
GEM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
13.94%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
6.54%
SK hynix, Inc.
4.36%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
2.59%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
1.68%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.32%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
0.84%
China Construction Bank Corp.
0.74%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
0.67%
US46434G8143
0.53%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
0.47%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
0.47%
HDFC Bank Ltd.
0.47%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
0.46%
King Slide Works Co., Ltd.
0.39%
Frequently asked questions about EMGF and GEM
How have the EMGF and GEM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 28, 2026, EMGF is up 19.02% year-to-date (YTD), while GEM has returned 16.2%. That puts EMGF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EMGF or GEM?
Year-to-date, the EMGF ETF saw +$305M in flows, compared to +$312M for GEM.
Which ETF is more volatile: EMGF or GEM?
Over the past year, EMGF had a volatility of 23.15%, while GEM experienced 23.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: EMGF or GEM?
As of October 28, 2026, EMGF holds $1.86 B in assets under management (AUM), while GEM manages $1.69 B.
What sectors do the EMGF and GEM ETFs invest in?
EMGF leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, GEM focuses on Technology and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the EMGF ETF and GEM ETF?
EMGF top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc.. GEM holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: EMGF or GEM?
EMGF holds 671 securities with 34.22% of its assets in the top 15. GEM has 740 securities and a top 15 weight of 35.49%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
