EMETvsMGNRETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Copper and Electrification ETF (EMET) and American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Non-Energy Materials. EMET is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.62%, versus 0.75% for MGNR. EMET is up 3.42% year-to-date (YTD) with +$752K in YTD flows. MGNR performs better with 12.76% YTD performance, and +$450M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EMET and MGNR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EMET vs MGNR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EMET MGNR | -4.38%+2.09% | -12.09%-7.88% | +3.42%+12.76% | +49.15%+47.39% | +45.99%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | EMET MGNR | -$4M+$21M | +$267K+$120M | +$752K+$450M | +$3M+$575M | +$1M- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EMET MGNR | +42.89%+23.63% | +37.00%+23.66% | +31.57%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | EMET MGNR | -22.93%-15.40% | -24.48%-15.40% | -39.33%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | EMET MGNR | 72d52d | 145d52d | 478dn/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
EMET | MGNR | |
Last sale 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.68 | |
| Previous close 07/24/2026 | $49.54 | |
| Consolidated volume 07/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MGNR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexEMET | MGNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EMET | MGNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $48.68 |
| 1D performance | – | -1.74% |
| AuM | $32.57 M | $839.46 M |
| E/R | 0.62% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
EMET | MGNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | VanEck | American Beacon |
| Benchmark | MarketVector Global Electrification Metals Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 57 | 44 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 11, 2021 | February 6, 2024 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EMET
Canada
18.81%
USA
16.47%
China
15.44%
United Kingdom
13.86%
Australia
7.51%
South Africa
7.27%
Other
20.65%
MGNR
USA
50.31%
Canada
22.92%
Other
26.77%
Sectors
EMET
Non-Energy Materi.
99.45%
Other
0.55%
MGNR
Non-Energy Materi.
53.87%
Energy
25.46%
Industrials
12.39%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.66%
Other
0.62%
Advertisement
Diversification
EMET
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.15%
MGNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.98%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
EMET
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
8.08%
Anglo American Plc
7.91%
Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.
7.17%
Teck Resources Limited
6.42%
Antofagasta Plc
5.04%
Southern Copper Corp.
3.69%
Boliden AB
3.67%
Lundin Mining Corp.
3.32%
Valterra Platinum Ltd.
2.99%
Albemarle Corp.
2.93%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
2.92%
KGHM Polska Miedz SA
2.54%
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co. Ltd.
2.32%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
2.10%
Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd.
2.05%
MGNR
Smurfit WestRock Plc
4.89%
Teck Resources Limited
4.84%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
4.48%
ArcelorMittal SA
4.08%
Range Resources Corp.
3.65%
Vista Energy SAB de CV
3.49%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc
3.27%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
3.27%
Antero Resources Corp.
3.20%
Nextpower, Inc.
3.13%
Alcoa Corp.
3.13%
Bloom Energy Corp.
3.08%
Bunge Global SA
2.98%
Kinross Gold Corp.
2.84%
Venture Global, Inc.
2.66%
Frequently asked questions about EMET and MGNR
How have the EMET and MGNR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, EMET is up 3.42% year-to-date (YTD), while MGNR has returned 12.76%. That puts MGNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EMET or MGNR?
Year-to-date, the EMET ETF saw +$752K in flows, compared to +$450M for MGNR.
Which ETF is more volatile: EMET or MGNR?
Over the past year, EMET had a volatility of 37%, while MGNR experienced 23.66%.
Which ETF is bigger: EMET or MGNR?
As of July 24, 2026, EMET holds $32.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while MGNR manages $839.46 M.
What sectors do the EMET and MGNR ETFs invest in?
EMET leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, MGNR focuses on Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the EMET ETF and MGNR ETF?
EMET top holdings include Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., Anglo American Plc and Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.. MGNR holds in its top three: Smurfit WestRock Plc, Teck Resources Limited and Hudbay Minerals, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: EMET or MGNR?
EMET holds 57 securities with 63.15% of its assets in the top 15. MGNR has 44 securities and a top 15 weight of 52.98%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
