EMETvsEARTETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Copper and Electrification ETF (EMET) and Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Non-Energy Materials. EMET is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.62%, versus 0.59% for EART. EMET is up 3.42% year-to-date (YTD) with +$752K in YTD flows. EART performs worse with -3.41% YTD performance, and +$23M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EMET and EART below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EMET vs EART performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EMET EART | -4.38%-9.24% | -12.09%-16.56% | +3.42%-3.41% | +49.15%+38.64% | +45.99%+48.53% | n/an/a |
| Flows | EMET EART | -$4M+$288K | +$267K+$2M | +$752K+$23M | +$3M+$36M | +$1M+$35M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EMET EART | +42.89%+36.11% | +37.00%+34.59% | +31.57%+28.13% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | EMET EART | -22.93%-25.67% | -24.48%-29.10% | -39.33%-33.56% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | EMET EART | 72d72d | 145d145d | 478d721d | n/an/a |
Trading data
EMET | EART | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.45 | |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $26.82 | |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EMET | EART | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EMET | EART | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $26.45 |
| 1D performance | – | -1.39% |
| AuM | $32.57 M | $37.93 M |
| E/R | 0.62% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
EMET | EART | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | Global X |
| Benchmark | MarketVector Global Electrification Metals Index | Solactive Rare Earth and Critical Materials Index |
| N° of holdings | 57 | 48 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 11, 2021 | January 24, 2022 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EMET
Canada
18.81%
USA
16.47%
China
15.44%
United Kingdom
13.86%
Australia
7.51%
South Africa
7.27%
Other
20.65%
EART
China
29.12%
USA
18.31%
United Kingdom
13.93%
South Africa
10.63%
Australia
10.3%
Other
17.71%
Sectors
EMET
Non-Energy Materi.
99.45%
Other
0.55%
EART
Non-Energy Materi.
92.75%
Other
7.25%
Advertisement
Diversification
EMET
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.15%
EART
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.8%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
EMET
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
8.08%
Anglo American Plc
7.91%
Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.
7.17%
Teck Resources Limited
6.42%
Antofagasta Plc
5.04%
Southern Copper Corp.
3.69%
Boliden AB
3.67%
Lundin Mining Corp.
3.32%
Valterra Platinum Ltd.
2.99%
Albemarle Corp.
2.93%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
2.92%
KGHM Polska Miedz SA
2.54%
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co. Ltd.
2.32%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
2.10%
Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd.
2.05%
EART
Anglo American Plc
4.92%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
4.70%
Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.
4.61%
Antofagasta Plc
4.54%
Rio Tinto Plc
4.46%
Southern Copper Corp.
4.31%
China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd.
4.16%
PLS Group Ltd.
3.85%
EVE Energy Co., Ltd.
3.85%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
3.73%
Boliden AB
3.55%
Zhejiang Huayou Cobalt Co., Ltd.
3.37%
Albemarle Corp.
3.31%
Valterra Platinum Ltd.
3.25%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
3.19%
Frequently asked questions about EMET and EART
How have the EMET and EART ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, EMET is up 3.42% year-to-date (YTD), while EART has lost -3.41%. That puts EMET better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EMET or EART?
Year-to-date, the EMET ETF saw +$752K in flows, compared to +$23M for EART.
Which ETF is more volatile: EMET or EART?
Over the past year, EMET had a volatility of 37%, while EART experienced 34.59%.
Which ETF is bigger: EMET or EART?
As of July 24, 2026, EMET holds $32.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while EART manages $37.93 M.
What sectors do the EMET and EART ETFs invest in?
EMET leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, EART focuses on Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the EMET ETF and EART ETF?
EMET top holdings include Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., Anglo American Plc and Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.. EART holds in its top three: Anglo American Plc, Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. and Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V..
Which ETF is more diversified: EMET or EART?
EMET holds 57 securities with 63.15% of its assets in the top 15. EART has 48 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.8%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
