BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

EMETvsCGWETF Comparison

ETF 1

EMET

VanEck Copper and Electrification ETF

This fund is part of

Natural Resources

-0.05%

Full EMET fund page

VS

ETF 2

CGW

Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF

This fund is part of

Natural Resources

-0.05%

Full CGW fund page

VanEck Copper and Electrification ETF (EMET) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. EMET's top 3 sector exposures are and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, CGW's top sector exposures are and Utilities.Industrials, Non-Energy Materials, EMET is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.62%, versus 0.59% for CGW. EMET is up 3.42% year-to-date (YTD) with +$752K in YTD flows. CGW performs worse with 2.83% YTD performance, and +$41M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EMET and CGW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

EMET vs CGW performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 07/24/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	EMET CGW	-4.38%+1.17%	-12.09%-1.74%	+3.42%+2.83%	+49.15%+5.61%	+45.99%+29.22%	n/a+26.17%
Flows	EMET CGW	-$4M+$10M	+$267K-$111M	+$752K+$41M	+$3M+$26M	+$1M-$160M	--$102M

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	EMET CGW	+42.89%+14.40%	+37.00%+13.15%	+31.57%+13.75%	n/a+15.72%
Max drawdown	EMET CGW	-22.93%-6.57%	-24.48%-10.52%	-39.33%-15.88%	n/a-32.65%
Max drawdown duration	EMET CGW	72d80d	145d148d	478d140d	n/a862d

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	EMET	CGW
Last sale 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM		$64.65
Previous close 07/24/2026		$64.67
Consolidated volume 07/24/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of June 30, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	EMET	CGW
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM

Live

Closed

	EMET	CGW
Last price	–	$64.65
1D performance	–	-0.03%
AuM	$32.57 M	$1.05 B
E/R	0.62%	0.59%

Characteristics

	EMET	CGW
Management strategy	Passive	Passive
Provider	VanEck	Invesco
Benchmark	MarketVector Global Electrification Metals Index	S&P Global Water Index
N° of holdings	57	67
Asset class	Equities	Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	November 11, 2021	May 14, 2007
ESG	Yes	Yes

More EMET data on Trackinsight

More CGW data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

EMET

Canada

18.81%

USA

16.47%

China

15.44%

United Kingdom

13.86%

Australia

7.51%

South Africa

7.27%

Other

20.65%

CGW

USA

59.15%

United Kingdom

11.29%

Brazil

10.57%

Other

18.99%

Sectors

EMET

Non-Energy Materi.

99.45%

Other

0.55%

CGW

Utilities

43.48%

Industrials

36.56%

Non-Energy Materi.

16.18%

Other

3.78%

Diversification

EMET

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

63.15%

CGW

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

65.66%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of June 30, 2026

EMET

Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.

8.08%

Anglo American Plc

7.91%

Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.

7.17%

Teck Resources Limited

6.42%

Antofagasta Plc

5.04%

Southern Copper Corp.

3.69%

Boliden AB

3.67%

Lundin Mining Corp.

3.32%

Valterra Platinum Ltd.

2.99%

Albemarle Corp.

2.93%

First Quantum Minerals Ltd.

2.92%

KGHM Polska Miedz SA

2.54%

Sumitomo Metal Mining Co. Ltd.

2.32%

Hudbay Minerals, Inc.

2.10%

Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd.

2.05%

CGW

American Water Works Co., Inc.

7.85%

Xylem, Inc.

7.34%

Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP

7.32%

Essential Utilities, Inc.

5.80%

Veralto Corp.

5.33%

Ecolab, Inc.

4.18%

United Utilities Group Plc

4.16%

Severn Trent Plc

3.95%

Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.

3.53%

Geberit AG

3.38%

Watts Water Technologies, Inc.

3.15%

American States Water Co.

2.63%

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.

2.41%

California Water Service Group

2.40%

Core & Main, Inc.

2.22%

Frequently asked questions about EMET and CGW

How have the EMET and CGW ETFs performed in 2026?

As of July 24, 2026, EMET is up 3.42% year-to-date (YTD), while CGW has returned 2.83%. That puts EMET better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EMET or CGW?

Year-to-date, the EMET ETF saw +$752K in flows, compared to +$41M for CGW.

Which ETF is more volatile: EMET or CGW?

Over the past year, EMET had a volatility of 37%, while CGW experienced 13.15%.

Which ETF is bigger: EMET or CGW?

As of July 24, 2026, EMET holds $32.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while CGW manages $1.05 B.

What sectors do the EMET and CGW ETFs invest in?

EMET leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, CGW focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.

What are the top holdings of the EMET ETF and CGW ETF?

EMET top holdings include Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., Anglo American Plc and Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.. CGW holds in its top three: American Water Works Co., Inc., Xylem, Inc. and Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP.

Which ETF is more diversified: EMET or CGW?

EMET holds 57 securities with 63.15% of its assets in the top 15. CGW has 67 securities and a top 15 weight of 65.66%.

There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water

January 17, 2024

CGW

EMETvsCGWETF Comparison

VanEck Copper and Electrification ETF

Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF

EMET vs CGW performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the EMET and CGW ETFs performed in 2026?

As of July 24, 2026, EMET is up 3.42% year-to-date (YTD), while CGW has returned 2.83%. That puts EMET better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EMET or CGW?

Year-to-date, the EMET ETF saw +$752K in flows, compared to +$41M for CGW.

Which ETF is more volatile: EMET or CGW?

Over the past year, EMET had a volatility of 37%, while CGW experienced 13.15%.

Which ETF is bigger: EMET or CGW?

As of July 24, 2026, EMET holds $32.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while CGW manages $1.05 B.

What sectors do the EMET and CGW ETFs invest in?

EMET leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, CGW focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.

What are the top holdings of the EMET ETF and CGW ETF?

EMET top holdings include Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., Anglo American Plc and Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.. CGW holds in its top three: American Water Works Co., Inc., Xylem, Inc. and Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP.

Which ETF is more diversified: EMET or CGW?

EMET holds 57 securities with 63.15% of its assets in the top 15. CGW has 67 securities and a top 15 weight of 65.66%.

There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water

The ETF Industry Is Evolving Fast