EMDVvsFLCHETF Comparison
ETF 1
EMDV
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF
This fund is part of
EM Large & Mid Cap
+1.11%
VS
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) belongs to the EM Large & Mid Cap segment. Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) is part of the China Blended Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. EMDV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.19% for FLCH. EMDV is up 3.04% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. FLCH performs worse with -13.99% YTD performance, and +$42M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EMDV and FLCH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EMDV vs FLCH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/19/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EMDV FLCH | +2.41%-4.46% | +4.04%-5.48% | +3.04%-13.99% | +6.13%-16.73% | +24.12%+35.05% | -9.09%-17.83% |
| Flows | EMDV FLCH | --$33M | -+$11M | -+$42M | -+$90M | -$8M+$158M | -$10M+$184M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EMDV FLCH | +7.46%+14.70% | +10.75%+18.74% | +11.52%+23.04% | +13.47%+26.30% |
| Max drawdown | EMDV FLCH | -4.35%-9.46% | -7.83%-21.10% | -15.08%-22.50% | -32.08%-49.77% |
| Max drawdown duration | EMDV FLCH | 42d70d | 250d263d | 400d382d | 1821d1422d |
Trading data
EMDV | FLCH | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:46 PM | $47.43 | $20.16 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $47.42 | $20.13 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EMDV | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:46 PM
Live
Closed
EMDV | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.43 | $20.16 |
| 1D performance | +0.03% | +0.15% |
| AuM | $7.39 M | $272.89 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.19% |
Characteristics
EMDV | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index | FTSE China RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 46 | 893 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 25, 2016 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EMDV
China
44.28%
India
22.12%
Other
33.6%
FLCH
China
91.11%
Other
8.89%
Sectors
EMDV
Technology
24.22%
Finance
23.88%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
18.88%
Healthcare
8.84%
Other
24.19%
FLCH
Technology
24.35%
Finance
21.84%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
16.22%
Industrials
7.57%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.14%
Other
22.88%
Advertisement
Diversification
EMDV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
36.58%
FLCH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.7%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
EMDV
Wistron Corp.
2.85%
Interconexion Eléctrica SA ESP
2.71%
HANKOOK TIRE & TECHNOLOGY Co., Ltd.
2.57%
WEG SA
2.48%
Pidilite Industries Ltd.
2.45%
Persistent Systems Ltd.
2.41%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
2.40%
Yuhan Corp.
2.38%
Mphasis Ltd.
2.36%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.35%
Coca-Cola FEMSA SAB de CV
2.33%
Shoprite Holdings Ltd.
2.33%
China Construction Bank Corp.
2.32%
Bank of Communications Co., Ltd.
2.32%
Midea Group Co. Ltd.
2.31%
FLCH
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
12.44%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
9.88%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.64%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.69%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
2.34%
Xiaomi Corp.
2.20%
Meituan
1.92%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.68%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.67%
NetEase, Inc.
1.59%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.54%
JD.com, Inc.
1.25%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
0.97%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
0.97%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
0.92%
Frequently asked questions about EMDV and FLCH
How have the EMDV and FLCH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 19, 2026, EMDV is up 3.04% year-to-date (YTD), while FLCH has lost -13.99%. That puts EMDV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EMDV or FLCH?
Year-to-date, the EMDV ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$42M for FLCH.
Which ETF is more volatile: EMDV or FLCH?
Over the past year, EMDV had a volatility of 10.75%, while FLCH experienced 18.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: EMDV or FLCH?
As of October 19, 2026, EMDV holds $7.39 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLCH manages $272.89 M.
What sectors do the EMDV and FLCH ETFs invest in?
EMDV leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, FLCH focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the EMDV ETF and FLCH ETF?
EMDV top holdings include Wistron Corp., Interconexion Eléctrica SA ESP and HANKOOK TIRE & TECHNOLOGY Co., Ltd.. FLCH holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: EMDV or FLCH?
EMDV holds 46 securities with 36.58% of its assets in the top 15. FLCH has 998 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.7%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
