Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EFIVvsGSUSETF Comparison
SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. EFIV's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. In contrast, GSUS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. EFIV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.1%, versus 0.09% for GSUS. EFIV is down -0.77% year-to-date (YTD) with -$160M in YTD flows. GSUS performs worse with -1.08% YTD performance, and -$10M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFIV and GSUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EFIV vs GSUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFIV GSUS | -2.91%-2.09% | -0.87%-1.69% | -0.77%-1.08% | +25.12%+22.50% | +84.66%+84.71% | +92.08%+83.90% |
| Flows | EFIV GSUS | +$160K-$543K | -$186M-$15M | -$160M-$10M | -$858M+$6M | -$310M+$1.10B | +$252M+$1.55B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFIV GSUS | +11.51%+11.62% | +18.01%+18.34% | +14.83%+14.95% | +16.95%+17.36% |
| Max drawdown | EFIV GSUS | -4.10%-3.51% | -13.79%-13.91% | -19.22%-19.14% | -24.63%-25.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | EFIV GSUS | 30d57d | 45d45d | 205d126d | 695d715d |
EFIV | GSUS | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $64.64 | $91.90 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $65.62 | $93.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EFIV | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EFIV | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $64.64 | $91.90 |
| 1D performance | -1.49% | -1.52% |
| AuM | $978.02 M | $2.94 B |
| E/R | 0.1% | 0.09% |
EFIV | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Scored & Screened Index | Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 300 | 400 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 28, 2020 | May 12, 2020 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EFIV and GSUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, EFIV is down -0.77% year-to-date (YTD), while GSUS has lost -1.08%. That puts EFIV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFIV or GSUS?
Year-to-date, the EFIV ETF saw -$160M in flows, compared to -$10M for GSUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFIV or GSUS?
Over the past year, EFIV had a volatility of 18.01%, while GSUS experienced 18.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFIV or GSUS?
As of March 11, 2026, EFIV holds $978.02 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSUS manages $2.94 B.
What sectors do the EFIV and GSUS ETFs invest in?
EFIV leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. Meanwhile, GSUS focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the EFIV ETF and GSUS ETF?
EFIV top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. GSUS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: EFIV or GSUS?
EFIV holds 311 securities with 52.69% of its assets in the top 15. GSUS has 419 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.2%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
