EFGvsGRINETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
GRIN
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.84%
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GRIN) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EFG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, GRIN's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. EFG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.34%, versus 1.06% for GRIN. EFG is up 6.85% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6.28B in YTD flows. GRIN performs better with 19.53% YTD performance, and +$70M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFG and GRIN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EFG vs GRIN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFG GRIN | -4.07%-1.72% | +2.76%+7.84% | +6.85%+19.53% | +10.00%+23.94% | +40.82%n/a | +16.61%n/a |
| Flows | EFG GRIN | -+$27M | +$295M+$68M | +$6.28B+$70M | +$2.12B+$149M | +$1.03B- | +$2.83B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFG GRIN | +18.44%+23.28% | +19.01%+21.80% | +17.18%n/a | +18.36%n/a |
| Max drawdown | EFG GRIN | -5.26%-10.01% | -12.79%-13.80% | -16.80%n/a | -35.34%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | EFG GRIN | 45d52d | 92d43d | 232dn/a | 1052dn/a |
Trading data
EFG | GRIN | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $121.77 | $32.79 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $120.77 | $32.89 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EFG | GRIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EFG | GRIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $121.77 | $32.79 |
| 1D performance | +0.83% | -0.29% |
| AuM | $16.51 B | $350.36 M |
| E/R | 0.34% | 1.06% |
Characteristics
EFG | GRIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | VictoryShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Growth Index | Victory International Free Cash Flow Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 354 | 101 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 1, 2005 | June 24, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EFG
Japan
22.47%
United Kingdom
11.43%
Switzerland
10.62%
Netherlands
10.24%
Germany
8.86%
France
7.81%
Other
28.57%
GRIN
Japan
20.96%
Canada
16.18%
United Kingdom
11.13%
Germany
8.47%
Netherlands
7.84%
Other
35.41%
Sectors
EFG
Industrials
25.56%
Technology
21.54%
Healthcare
12.75%
Finance
12.57%
Other
27.58%
GRIN
Technology
28.55%
Industrials
28%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.82%
Healthcare
9.91%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.36%
Other
13.37%
Advertisement
Diversification
EFG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.51%
GRIN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.06%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
EFG
ASML Holding NV
5.97%
AstraZeneca PLC
2.40%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
1.94%
SAP SE
1.74%
Schneider Electric SE
1.67%
UBS Group AG
1.56%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
1.53%
Novo Nordisk A/S
1.52%
ABB Ltd.
1.42%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.36%
Hitachi Ltd.
1.35%
Sony Group Corp.
1.30%
Airbus SE
1.29%
Safran SA
1.25%
Siemens Energy AG
1.21%
GRIN
ASML Holding NV
3.64%
Advantest Corp.
3.46%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
2.52%
Barrick Mining Corp.
2.35%
TechnipFMC plc
2.26%
SAP SE
2.25%
Siemens Energy AG
2.20%
Bombardier, Inc.
2.18%
Novo Nordisk A/S
2.09%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
2.07%
AstraZeneca PLC
2.02%
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
1.85%
Sea Ltd. (Singapore)
1.81%
InterContinental Hotels Group Plc
1.74%
UCB SA
1.63%
Frequently asked questions about EFG and GRIN
How have the EFG and GRIN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, EFG is up 6.85% year-to-date (YTD), while GRIN has returned 19.53%. That puts GRIN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFG or GRIN?
Year-to-date, the EFG ETF saw +$6.28B in flows, compared to +$70M for GRIN.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFG or GRIN?
Over the past year, EFG had a volatility of 19.01%, while GRIN experienced 21.8%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFG or GRIN?
As of September 10, 2026, EFG holds $16.51 B in assets under management (AUM), while GRIN manages $350.36 M.
What sectors do the EFG and GRIN ETFs invest in?
EFG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, GRIN focuses on Technology, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the EFG ETF and GRIN ETF?
EFG top holdings include ASML Holding NV, AstraZeneca PLC and Commonwealth Bank of Australia. GRIN holds in its top three: ASML Holding NV, Advantest Corp. and Kioxia Holdings Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: EFG or GRIN?
EFG holds 359 securities with 27.51% of its assets in the top 15. GRIN has 101 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.06%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
