EFGvsFNDFETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+1.12%
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EFG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. In contrast, FNDF's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Energy. EFG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.34%, versus 0.25% for FNDF. EFG is up 8.38% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5.98B in YTD flows. FNDF performs better with 18.54% YTD performance, and +$1.02B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFG and FNDF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EFG vs FNDF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/12/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFG FNDF | +2.53%+1.58% | +8.45%+10.22% | +8.38%+18.54% | +12.89%+39.66% | +36.29%+86.57% | +22.35%+84.52% |
| Flows | EFG FNDF | +$884M+$89M | +$5.98B+$439M | +$5.98B+$1.02B | +$1.83B+$2.09B | -$298M+$5.19B | +$4.31B+$8.73B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFG FNDF | +26.08%+17.68% | +18.39%+14.01% | +16.95%+14.06% | +18.14%+14.78% |
| Max drawdown | EFG FNDF | -6.10%-4.32% | -12.79%-10.49% | -16.80%-13.78% | -35.55%-25.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | EFG FNDF | 22d9d | 92d65d | 232d44d | 1114d545d |
Trading data
EFG | FNDF | |
Last sale 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $123.54 | $54.10 |
| Previous close 06/11/2026 | $123.49 | $53.89 |
| Consolidated volume 06/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EFG | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EFG | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $123.54 | $54.10 |
| 1D performance | +0.04% | +0.39% |
| AuM | $16.59 B | $24.30 B |
| E/R | 0.34% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
EFG | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Growth Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index |
| N° of holdings | 341 | 825 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 1, 2005 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EFG
Japan
23.37%
United Kingdom
11.56%
Netherlands
10.75%
Switzerland
10.33%
France
9.9%
Germany
9.45%
Other
24.64%
FNDF
Japan
22.42%
United Kingdom
13.72%
Republic of Korea
9.6%
Canada
8.73%
France
8.17%
Germany
7.56%
Other
29.81%
Sectors
EFG
Industrials
28.68%
Information Techn.
16.97%
Health Care
11.18%
Consumer Discreti.
11.17%
Financials
10.38%
Other
21.64%
FNDF
Financials
16.46%
Industrials
14.64%
Energy
11.78%
Materials
10.87%
Consumer Discreti.
10.85%
Information Techn.
10.02%
Other
25.39%
Advertisement
Diversification
EFG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.28%
FNDF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.63%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
EFG
ASML HOLDING
5.45%
ASTRAZENECA
2.88%
NOVARTIS
2.76%
SAP SE
1.73%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE
1.69%
SIEMENS ENERGY AG
1.61%
ABB
1.54%
HITACHI
1.39%
UBS GROUP AG
1.37%
ADVANTEST
1.35%
DK0062498333
1.34%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
1.33%
ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS
1.32%
LVMH MOET HENNESSY LOUIS VUITT
1.29%
TOKYO ELECTRON
1.24%
FNDF
SAMSUNG ELECTR
4.20%
SHELL PLC
2.52%
TOTALENERGIES SE
1.88%
GLENCORE PLC
1.31%
BP
1.29%
BHP GROUP LTD
1.18%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.03%
TOYOTA
0.97%
CH1499059983
0.86%
RIO TINTO
0.81%
SK HYNIX
0.77%
BANCO SANTANDER SA
0.75%
NESTLE SA
0.74%
MERCEDES-BENZ GROUP AG
0.67%
MITSUBISHI
0.66%
Frequently asked questions about EFG and FNDF
How have the EFG and FNDF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 12, 2026, EFG is up 8.38% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDF has returned 18.54%. That puts FNDF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFG or FNDF?
Year-to-date, the EFG ETF saw +$5.98B in flows, compared to +$1.02B for FNDF.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFG or FNDF?
Over the past year, EFG had a volatility of 18.39%, while FNDF experienced 14.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFG or FNDF?
As of June 12, 2026, EFG holds $16.59 B in assets under management (AUM), while FNDF manages $24.30 B.
What sectors do the EFG and FNDF ETFs invest in?
EFG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. Meanwhile, FNDF focuses on Financials, Industrials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the EFG ETF and FNDF ETF?
EFG top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ASTRAZENECA and NOVARTIS. FNDF holds in its top three: SAMSUNG ELECTR, SHELL PLC and TOTALENERGIES SE.
Which ETF is more diversified: EFG or FNDF?
EFG holds 369 securities with 28.28% of its assets in the top 15. FNDF has 874 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.63%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
