Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EFGvsEFAXETF Comparison
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (EFAX) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EFG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, EFAX's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. EFG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.34%, versus 0.2% for EFAX. EFG is up 1.72% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. EFAX performs worse with 1.32% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFG and EFAX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EFG vs EFAX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFG EFAX | -5.55%-5.98% | +1.72%+2.68% | +1.72%+1.32% | +16.65%+22.35% | +39.74%+57.26% | +25.73%+47.46% |
| Flows | EFG EFAX | -- | +$45M+$30M | -+$5M | -$5.27B+$83M | -$4.38B+$122M | -$2.35B+$209M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFG EFAX | +17.00%+14.83% | +17.97%+16.30% | +15.65%+13.90% | +17.38%+15.08% |
| Max drawdown | EFG EFAX | -6.63%-8.50% | -14.12%-14.17% | -16.80%-14.22% | -35.55%-31.37% |
| Max drawdown duration | EFG EFAX | 14d10d | 45d41d | 232d53d | 1114d910d |
EFG | EFAX | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $114.26 | $50.32 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $115.70 | $51.15 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EFG | EFAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EFG | EFAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $114.26 | $50.32 |
| 1D performance | -1.25% | -1.61% |
| AuM | $9.54 B | $480.46 M |
| E/R | 0.34% | 0.2% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EFG and EFAX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, EFG is up 1.72% year-to-date (YTD), while EFAX has returned 1.32%. That puts EFG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFG or EFAX?
Year-to-date, the EFG ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$5M for EFAX.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFG or EFAX?
Over the past year, EFG had a volatility of 17.97%, while EFAX experienced 16.3%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFG or EFAX?
As of March 11, 2026, EFG holds $9.54 B in assets under management (AUM), while EFAX manages $480.46 M.
What sectors do the EFG and EFAX ETFs invest in?
EFG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, EFAX focuses on Financials, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the EFG ETF and EFAX ETF?
EFG top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ASTRAZENECA and NOVARTIS. EFAX holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: EFG or EFAX?
EFG holds 367 securities with 28.43% of its assets in the top 15. EFAX has 642 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.71%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
