EFGvsEASGETF Comparison
VS
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF (EASG) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EFG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, EASG's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. EFG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.34%, versus 0.14% for EASG. EFG is up 7.66% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6.28B in YTD flows. EASG performs better with 11.64% YTD performance, and +$23M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFG and EASG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EFG vs EASG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFG EASG | -3.57%-1.53% | -0.34%+4.25% | +7.66%+11.64% | +9.55%+17.23% | +41.88%+54.73% | +17.10%+39.82% |
| Flows | EFG EASG | -+$25M | +$295M+$23M | +$6.28B+$23M | +$2.12B+$23M | +$1.03B+$31M | +$2.83B+$58M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFG EASG | +16.78%+11.14% | +18.99%+13.97% | +17.18%+14.46% | +18.36%+15.52% |
| Max drawdown | EFG EASG | -5.26%-2.41% | -12.79%-11.19% | -16.80%-17.25% | -35.34%-30.97% |
| Max drawdown duration | EFG EASG | 45d15d | 92d103d | 232d232d | 1052d898d |
Trading data
EFG | EASG | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $121.77 | $38.74 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $120.77 | $38.39 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EFG | EASG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EFG | EASG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $121.77 | $38.74 |
| 1D performance | +0.83% | +0.92% |
| AuM | $16.64 B | $93.08 M |
| E/R | 0.34% | 0.14% |
Characteristics
EFG | EASG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Growth Index | MSCI EAFE Selection Index |
| N° of holdings | 354 | 464 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 1, 2005 | September 6, 2018 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EFG
Japan
22.47%
United Kingdom
11.43%
Switzerland
10.62%
Netherlands
10.24%
Germany
8.86%
France
7.81%
Other
28.57%
EASG
Japan
23.93%
United Kingdom
14.64%
France
11.75%
Switzerland
9.3%
Netherlands
8.47%
Other
31.91%
Sectors
EFG
Industrials
25.56%
Technology
21.54%
Healthcare
12.75%
Finance
12.57%
Other
27.58%
EASG
Finance
27.89%
Technology
14.54%
Industrials
13.45%
Healthcare
10.32%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.49%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.07%
Other
18.24%
Advertisement
Diversification
EFG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.51%
EASG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.09%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
EFG
ASML Holding NV
5.97%
AstraZeneca PLC
2.40%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
1.94%
SAP SE
1.74%
Schneider Electric SE
1.67%
UBS Group AG
1.56%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
1.53%
Novo Nordisk A/S
1.52%
ABB Ltd.
1.42%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.36%
Hitachi Ltd.
1.35%
Sony Group Corp.
1.30%
Airbus SE
1.29%
Safran SA
1.25%
Siemens Energy AG
1.21%
EASG
ASML Holding NV
5.44%
HSBC Holdings Plc
3.13%
Novartis AG
2.58%
AstraZeneca PLC
2.30%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
1.84%
Allianz SE
1.65%
TotalEnergies SE
1.47%
Novo Nordisk A/S
1.46%
Schneider Electric SE
1.45%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
1.37%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.35%
ABB Ltd.
1.31%
Iberdrola SA
1.29%
Unilever Plc
1.28%
LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE
1.18%
Frequently asked questions about EFG and EASG
How have the EFG and EASG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, EFG is up 7.66% year-to-date (YTD), while EASG has returned 11.64%. That puts EASG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFG or EASG?
Year-to-date, the EFG ETF saw +$6.28B in flows, compared to +$23M for EASG.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFG or EASG?
Over the past year, EFG had a volatility of 18.99%, while EASG experienced 13.97%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFG or EASG?
As of September 11, 2026, EFG holds $16.64 B in assets under management (AUM), while EASG manages $93.08 M.
What sectors do the EFG and EASG ETFs invest in?
EFG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, EASG focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the EFG ETF and EASG ETF?
EFG top holdings include ASML Holding NV, AstraZeneca PLC and Commonwealth Bank of Australia. EASG holds in its top three: ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc and Novartis AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: EFG or EASG?
EFG holds 359 securities with 27.51% of its assets in the top 15. EASG has 469 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.09%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
