Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EFAXvsPQNTETF Comparison
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (EFAX) and Pictet AI Enhanced International Equity ETF (PQNT) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EFAX's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, PQNT's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. EFAX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.3% for PQNT. EFAX is up 1.32% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. PQNT performs better with 2.71% YTD performance, and -$1M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFAX and PQNT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EFAX vs PQNT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFAX PQNT | -5.98%-3.78% | +2.68%+5.00% | +1.32%+2.71% | +22.35%n/a | +57.26%n/a | +47.46%n/a |
| Flows | EFAX PQNT | --$1M | +$30M-$1M | +$5M-$1M | +$83M- | +$122M- | +$209M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFAX PQNT | +14.83%+15.39% | +16.30%n/a | +13.90%n/a | +15.08%n/a |
| Max drawdown | EFAX PQNT | -8.50%-7.78% | -14.17%n/a | -14.22%n/a | -31.37%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | EFAX PQNT | 10d9d | 41dn/a | 53dn/a | 910dn/a |
EFAX | PQNT | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $50.32 | $21.19 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $51.15 | $21.48 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EFAX | PQNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EFAX | PQNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $50.32 | $21.19 |
| 1D performance | -1.61% | -1.36% |
| AuM | $480.46 M | $8.65 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.3% |
EFAX | PQNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | SPDR | Pictet Asset Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 610 | 225 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 24, 2016 | October 15, 2025 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EFAX and PQNT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, EFAX is up 1.32% year-to-date (YTD), while PQNT has returned 2.71%. That puts PQNT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFAX or PQNT?
Year-to-date, the EFAX ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to -$1M for PQNT.
Which ETF is bigger: EFAX or PQNT?
As of March 11, 2026, EFAX holds $480.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while PQNT manages $8.65 M.
What sectors do the EFAX and PQNT ETFs invest in?
EFAX leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, PQNT focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the EFAX ETF and PQNT ETF?
EFAX top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS. PQNT holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, SAP SE and SONY GROUP CORPORATION.
Which ETF is more diversified: EFAX or PQNT?
EFAX holds 642 securities with 18.71% of its assets in the top 15. PQNT has 232 securities and a top 15 weight of 21.01%.
ETF Takeover: Discover the Pictet AI Enhanced International Equity ETF (PQNT)
What's the Fund | Pictet AI Enhanced International Equity ETF
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
