Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EFAXvsCEFAETF Comparison
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (EFAX) and Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EFAX's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, CEFA's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. EFAX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.35% for CEFA. EFAX is up 0.13% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. CEFA performs better with 0.99% YTD performance, and +$11M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFAX and CEFA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EFAX vs CEFA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFAX CEFA | -7.17%-7.13% | +1.51%+1.75% | +0.13%+0.99% | +20.24%+19.65% | +55.41%+51.10% | +45.89%+37.92% |
| Flows | EFAX CEFA | -+$9M | +$30M+$12M | +$5M+$11M | +$83M+$18M | +$122M+$21M | +$209M+$32M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFAX CEFA | +15.04%+15.10% | +16.34%+16.34% | +13.91%+14.03% | +15.09%+15.61% |
| Max drawdown | EFAX CEFA | -8.50%-8.32% | -14.17%-14.08% | -14.22%-14.76% | -31.37%-31.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | EFAX CEFA | 11d11d | 41d42d | 53d214d | 910d905d |
EFAX | CEFA | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 3:05 PM | $50.06 | $37.09 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $50.32 | $37.15 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EFAX | CEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EFAX | CEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $50.06 | $37.09 |
| 1D performance | -0.52% | -0.16% |
| AuM | $474.83 M | $40.63 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.35% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EFAX and CEFA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, EFAX is up 0.13% year-to-date (YTD), while CEFA has returned 0.99%. That puts CEFA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFAX or CEFA?
Year-to-date, the EFAX ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$11M for CEFA.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFAX or CEFA?
Over the past year, EFAX had a volatility of 16.34%, while CEFA experienced 16.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFAX or CEFA?
As of March 12, 2026, EFAX holds $474.83 M in assets under management (AUM), while CEFA manages $40.63 M.
What sectors do the EFAX and CEFA ETFs invest in?
EFAX leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, CEFA focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the EFAX ETF and CEFA ETF?
EFAX top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS. CEFA holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ESSILORLUXOTTICA and SIEMENS.
Which ETF is more diversified: EFAX or CEFA?
EFAX holds 642 securities with 18.71% of its assets in the top 15. CEFA has 358 securities and a top 15 weight of 22.09%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
