Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EFAVvsJHMDETF Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) belongs to the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Health Care. EFAV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.43% for JHMD. EFAV is up 5.28% year-to-date (YTD) with -$41M in YTD flows. JHMD performs worse with 3.49% YTD performance, and +$150M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFAV and JHMD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EFAV vs JHMD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFAV JHMD | -2.72%-5.45% | +6.77%+4.93% | +5.28%+3.49% | +20.93%+26.02% | +54.14%+59.90% | +44.87%+54.42% |
| Flows | EFAV JHMD | +$13M+$65M | -$41M+$270M | -$41M+$150M | -$646M+$354M | -$3.74B+$469M | -$5.65B+$495M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFAV JHMD | +9.36%+14.24% | +11.11%+15.89% | +10.03%+13.63% | +11.22%+14.71% |
| Max drawdown | EFAV JHMD | -4.37%-8.29% | -7.49%-13.96% | -9.09%-13.96% | -27.61%-28.98% |
| Max drawdown duration | EFAV JHMD | 10d10d | 27d41d | 232d41d | 1058d840d |
EFAV | JHMD | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $90.09 | $42.44 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $90.68 | $43.01 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EFAV | JHMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EFAV | JHMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $90.09 | $42.44 |
| 1D performance | -0.65% | -1.33% |
| AuM | $5.41 B | $1.18 B |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.43% |
EFAV | JHMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | John Hancock Investments |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index | John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index |
| N° of holdings | 233 | 501 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 18, 2011 | December 15, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EFAV and JHMD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, EFAV is up 5.28% year-to-date (YTD), while JHMD has returned 3.49%. That puts EFAV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFAV or JHMD?
Year-to-date, the EFAV ETF saw -$41M in flows, compared to +$150M for JHMD.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFAV or JHMD?
Over the past year, EFAV had a volatility of 11.11%, while JHMD experienced 15.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFAV or JHMD?
As of March 11, 2026, EFAV holds $5.41 B in assets under management (AUM), while JHMD manages $1.18 B.
What sectors do the EFAV and JHMD ETFs invest in?
EFAV leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, JHMD focuses on Financials, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the EFAV ETF and JHMD ETF?
EFAV top holdings include NOVARTIS, DBS GROUP HOLDINGS and SWISSCOM. JHMD holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, NOVARTIS and VINCI.
Which ETF is more diversified: EFAV or JHMD?
EFAV holds 243 securities with 20.85% of its assets in the top 15. JHMD has 530 securities and a top 15 weight of 15.61%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
