EFADvsSCHFETF Comparison
VS
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EFAD's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, SCHF's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. EFAD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.03% for SCHF. EFAD is up 4.37% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. SCHF performs better with 12.91% YTD performance, and +$3.33B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFAD and SCHF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EFAD vs SCHF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFAD SCHF | +0.80%-3.68% | -0.66%+1.72% | +4.37%+12.91% | +6.03%+27.65% | +23.45%+63.37% | +5.33%+64.03% |
| Flows | EFAD SCHF | -+$1.05B | -$1M+$1.49B | -$3M+$3.33B | -$11M+$5.28B | -$42M+$13.38B | -$59M+$20.38B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFAD SCHF | +10.15%+16.08% | +11.87%+14.89% | +12.60%+14.24% | +13.68%+15.01% |
| Max drawdown | EFAD SCHF | -4.74%-3.68% | -9.95%-11.13% | -15.06%-13.58% | -35.77%-28.95% |
| Max drawdown duration | EFAD SCHF | 74d30d | 138d65d | 236d211d | 1633d897d |
Trading data
EFAD | SCHF | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $43.14 | $27.01 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $43.11 | $27.16 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EFAD | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EFAD | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.14 | $27.01 |
| 1D performance | +0.07% | -0.55% |
| AuM | $61.69 M | $65.58 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.03% |
Characteristics
EFAD | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Dividends Masters Index | FTSE Developed ex US Index |
| N° of holdings | 75 | 1403 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 19, 2014 | November 3, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EFAD
Japan
26.07%
United Kingdom
13.57%
Switzerland
12.11%
Australia
9.92%
Other
38.33%
SCHF
Japan
20.72%
United Kingdom
10.7%
Canada
10.28%
Republic of Korea
9.58%
Switzerland
7.39%
Other
41.34%
Sectors
EFAD
Technology
23.07%
Healthcare
15.42%
Finance
15.01%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.93%
Industrials
7.94%
Utilities
7.59%
Other
19.05%
SCHF
Finance
26.79%
Technology
16.69%
Industrials
14.96%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.12%
Healthcare
7.75%
Other
25.69%
Advertisement
Diversification
EFAD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
23.63%
SCHF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.31%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
EFAD
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
2.55%
Logitech International SA
1.62%
London Stock Exchange Group Plc
1.60%
Lasertec Corp.
1.56%
Terumo Corp.
1.54%
Deutsche Börse AG
1.51%
Halma Plc
1.51%
ASML Holding NV
1.50%
Washington H. Soul Pattinson & Co. Ltd.
1.50%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
1.48%
APA Group
1.48%
Bunzl Plc
1.46%
Computershare Ltd.
1.45%
The Sage Group plc
1.43%
RELX Plc
1.42%
SCHF
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
3.24%
SK hynix, Inc.
2.53%
ASML Holding NV
2.15%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.11%
Roche Holding AG
1.02%
Novartis AG
1.00%
AstraZeneca PLC
0.97%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.92%
Nestlé SA
0.90%
Shell Plc
0.85%
Siemens AG
0.80%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.73%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.73%
Toyota Motor Corp.
0.70%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
0.68%
Frequently asked questions about EFAD and SCHF
How have the EFAD and SCHF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, EFAD is up 4.37% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHF has returned 12.91%. That puts SCHF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFAD or SCHF?
Year-to-date, the EFAD ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to +$3.33B for SCHF.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFAD or SCHF?
Over the past year, EFAD had a volatility of 11.87%, while SCHF experienced 14.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFAD or SCHF?
As of July 17, 2026, EFAD holds $61.69 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCHF manages $65.58 B.
What sectors do the EFAD and SCHF ETFs invest in?
EFAD leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, SCHF focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the EFAD ETF and SCHF ETF?
EFAD top holdings include Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Logitech International SA and London Stock Exchange Group Plc. SCHF holds in its top three: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., SK hynix, Inc. and ASML Holding NV.
Which ETF is more diversified: EFAD or SCHF?
EFAD holds 75 securities with 23.63% of its assets in the top 15. SCHF has 1429 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.31%.
Advertisement
Latest news about EFAD & SCHF
Should you add international equities to your investment portfolio?
November 1, 2022
SCHF
Advertisement
Advertisement
