EFADvsREFAETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
REFA
Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.06%
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF (REFA) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EFAD's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, REFA's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. EFAD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.32% for REFA. EFAD is up 7.52% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. REFA performs better with 14.3% YTD performance, and +$3K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFAD and REFA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EFAD vs REFA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFAD REFA | +0.97%+0.93% | +4.42%+5.69% | +7.52%+14.30% | +9.46%n/a | +31.43%n/a | +2.12%n/a |
| Flows | EFAD REFA | -- | -- | -$3M+$3K | -$11M- | -$42M- | -$59M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFAD REFA | +9.76%+11.90% | +11.71%n/a | +12.57%n/a | +13.67%n/a |
| Max drawdown | EFAD REFA | -2.60%-2.81% | -9.95%n/a | -15.06%n/a | -35.77%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | EFAD REFA | 21d16d | 149dn/a | 236dn/a | 1633dn/a |
Trading data
EFAD | REFA | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.01 | |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $44.45 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EFAD | REFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EFAD | REFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.01 | – |
| 1D performance | +1.26% | – |
| AuM | $63.56 M | $5.86 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.32% |
Characteristics
EFAD | REFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Dividends Masters Index | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced International Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 73 | 211 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 19, 2014 | December 11, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EFAD
Japan
23.62%
United Kingdom
13.58%
Switzerland
13.01%
Australia
11.24%
Other
38.56%
REFA
Japan
26.38%
United Kingdom
14.95%
France
8.52%
Germany
7.39%
Switzerland
7.32%
Australia
7.28%
Other
28.16%
Sectors
EFAD
Technology
19.97%
Healthcare
17.75%
Finance
15.94%
Non-Energy Materi.
12.24%
Industrials
7.83%
Utilities
7.77%
Other
18.5%
REFA
Finance
25.23%
Industrials
16.36%
Technology
13.6%
Healthcare
12.56%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.71%
Other
24.54%
Advertisement
Diversification
EFAD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
22.86%
REFA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.66%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
EFAD
SEGRO PLC
1.84%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
1.65%
Pro Medicus Ltd.
1.59%
Computershare Ltd.
1.54%
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corp. Ltd.
1.52%
Lasertec Corp.
1.52%
FUJIFILM Holdings Corp.
1.51%
CSL Ltd.
1.51%
Bunzl Plc
1.48%
Sonic Healthcare Ltd.
1.48%
ASML Holding NV
1.45%
Symrise AG
1.45%
Givaudan SA
1.44%
Novo Nordisk A/S
1.44%
Sika AG
1.44%
REFA
ASML Holding NV
3.69%
Roche Holding AG
3.28%
BHP Group Ltd.
3.17%
Novartis AG
2.87%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.47%
HSBC Holdings Plc
2.31%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.24%
Advantest Corp.
1.88%
Safran SA
1.86%
Siemens Energy AG
1.78%
Shell Plc
1.73%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.73%
BNP Paribas SA
1.64%
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
1.63%
Deutsche Telekom AG
1.38%
Frequently asked questions about EFAD and REFA
How have the EFAD and REFA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, EFAD is up 7.52% year-to-date (YTD), while REFA has returned 14.3%. That puts REFA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFAD or REFA?
Year-to-date, the EFAD ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to +$3K for REFA.
Which ETF is bigger: EFAD or REFA?
As of September 2, 2026, EFAD holds $63.56 M in assets under management (AUM), while REFA manages $5.86 M.
What sectors do the EFAD and REFA ETFs invest in?
EFAD leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, REFA focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the EFAD ETF and REFA ETF?
EFAD top holdings include SEGRO PLC, Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and Pro Medicus Ltd.. REFA holds in its top three: ASML Holding NV, Roche Holding AG and BHP Group Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: EFAD or REFA?
EFAD holds 73 securities with 22.86% of its assets in the top 15. REFA has 211 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.66%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
