EFADvsREFAETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
REFA
Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.43%
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF (REFA) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EFAD's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, REFA's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. EFAD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.32% for REFA. EFAD is up 9.22% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. REFA performs better with 12.14% YTD performance, and +$3K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFAD and REFA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EFAD vs REFA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFAD REFA | +2.82%-1.08% | +4.45%+1.37% | +9.22%+12.14% | +8.75%n/a | +41.31%n/a | +9.72%n/a |
| Flows | EFAD REFA | -- | -- | -$3M+$3K | -$7M- | -$42M- | -$59M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFAD REFA | +10.03%+10.27% | +11.89%n/a | +12.52%n/a | +13.68%n/a |
| Max drawdown | EFAD REFA | -5.70%-5.27% | -9.95%n/a | -15.06%n/a | -34.10%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | EFAD REFA | 52d52d | 149dn/a | 236dn/a | 1540dn/a |
Trading data
EFAD | REFA | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 7:02 PM | $44.60 | |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $44.41 | |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EFAD | REFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 7:02 PM
Live
Closed
EFAD | REFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.60 | – |
| 1D performance | +0.44% | – |
| AuM | $64.33 M | $5.75 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.32% |
Characteristics
EFAD | REFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Dividends Masters Index | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced International Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 73 | 211 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 19, 2014 | December 11, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EFAD
Japan
22.76%
United Kingdom
13.55%
Switzerland
12.95%
Australia
12.29%
Other
38.46%
REFA
Japan
26.58%
United Kingdom
14.86%
France
8.26%
Germany
7.46%
Australia
7.41%
Switzerland
7.17%
Other
28.26%
Sectors
EFAD
Technology
19.84%
Healthcare
18.69%
Finance
15.12%
Non-Energy Materi.
12.51%
Industrials
7.88%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.72%
Other
18.24%
REFA
Finance
25.42%
Industrials
16.45%
Technology
13.7%
Healthcare
12.32%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.91%
Other
24.2%
Advertisement
Diversification
EFAD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
23.89%
REFA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.33%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
EFAD
CSL Ltd.
2.18%
Pro Medicus Ltd.
1.81%
SEGRO PLC
1.76%
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corp. Ltd.
1.68%
Sika AG
1.64%
Lotus Bakeries NV
1.53%
Northern Star Resources Ltd.
1.52%
The Sage Group plc
1.52%
Symrise AG
1.49%
ASML Holding NV
1.48%
Computershare Ltd.
1.47%
Bunzl Plc
1.46%
Kao Corp.
1.45%
SAP SE
1.45%
Givaudan SA
1.44%
REFA
ASML Holding NV
3.63%
BHP Group Ltd.
3.23%
Roche Holding AG
3.19%
Novartis AG
2.81%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.54%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.34%
HSBC Holdings Plc
2.30%
Safran SA
1.85%
Advantest Corp.
1.84%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.78%
Siemens Energy AG
1.75%
Shell Plc
1.66%
BNP Paribas SA
1.55%
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
1.51%
Deutsche Telekom AG
1.35%
Frequently asked questions about EFAD and REFA
How have the EFAD and REFA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, EFAD is up 9.22% year-to-date (YTD), while REFA has returned 12.14%. That puts REFA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFAD or REFA?
Year-to-date, the EFAD ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to +$3K for REFA.
Which ETF is bigger: EFAD or REFA?
As of October 16, 2026, EFAD holds $64.33 M in assets under management (AUM), while REFA manages $5.75 M.
What sectors do the EFAD and REFA ETFs invest in?
EFAD leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, REFA focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the EFAD ETF and REFA ETF?
EFAD top holdings include CSL Ltd., Pro Medicus Ltd. and SEGRO PLC. REFA holds in its top three: ASML Holding NV, BHP Group Ltd. and Roche Holding AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: EFAD or REFA?
EFAD holds 73 securities with 23.89% of its assets in the top 15. REFA has 211 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.33%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
