EFADvsQEFAETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QEFA
State Street SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.06%
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and State Street SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EFAD's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, QEFA's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. EFAD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.3% for QEFA. EFAD is up 7.52% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. QEFA performs better with 12.67% YTD performance, and -$9M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFAD and QEFA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EFAD vs QEFA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFAD QEFA | +0.97%+1.05% | +4.42%+5.45% | +7.52%+12.67% | +9.46%+20.84% | +31.43%+60.57% | +2.12%+48.45% |
| Flows | EFAD QEFA | --$5M | --$57M | -$3M-$9M | -$11M-$21M | -$42M-$240M | -$59M-$2M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFAD QEFA | +9.76%+8.65% | +11.71%+11.15% | +12.57%+12.43% | +13.67%+13.58% |
| Max drawdown | EFAD QEFA | -2.60%-2.25% | -9.95%-9.43% | -15.06%-12.30% | -35.77%-27.87% |
| Max drawdown duration | EFAD QEFA | 21d14d | 149d149d | 236d38d | 1633d892d |
Trading data
EFAD | QEFA | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.01 | $101.91 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $44.45 | $100.87 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EFAD | QEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EFAD | QEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.01 | $101.91 |
| 1D performance | +1.26% | +1.04% |
| AuM | $63.56 M | $1.07 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.3% |
Characteristics
EFAD | QEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Dividends Masters Index | MSCI EAFE Factor Mix A-Series Index |
| N° of holdings | 73 | 617 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 19, 2014 | June 4, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EFAD
Japan
23.62%
United Kingdom
13.58%
Switzerland
13.01%
Australia
11.24%
Other
38.56%
QEFA
Japan
22.19%
United Kingdom
14.39%
Switzerland
12.33%
France
7.94%
Germany
7.25%
Other
35.9%
Sectors
EFAD
Technology
19.97%
Healthcare
17.75%
Finance
15.94%
Non-Energy Materi.
12.24%
Industrials
7.83%
Utilities
7.77%
Other
18.5%
QEFA
Finance
22.65%
Industrials
13.09%
Healthcare
13.02%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.67%
Technology
10.26%
Other
30.31%
Advertisement
Diversification
EFAD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
22.86%
QEFA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.19%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
EFAD
SEGRO PLC
1.84%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
1.65%
Pro Medicus Ltd.
1.59%
Computershare Ltd.
1.54%
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corp. Ltd.
1.52%
Lasertec Corp.
1.52%
FUJIFILM Holdings Corp.
1.51%
CSL Ltd.
1.51%
Bunzl Plc
1.48%
Sonic Healthcare Ltd.
1.48%
ASML Holding NV
1.45%
Symrise AG
1.45%
Givaudan SA
1.44%
Novo Nordisk A/S
1.44%
Sika AG
1.44%
QEFA
Novartis AG
2.04%
ASML Holding NV
2.04%
Roche Holding AG
1.89%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.63%
Nestlé SA
1.60%
Shell Plc
1.22%
Unilever Plc
1.17%
Allianz SE
1.06%
Zurich Insurance Group AG
1.04%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.04%
SAP SE
0.97%
Novo Nordisk A/S
0.95%
TotalEnergies SE
0.87%
GSK Plc
0.85%
HSBC Holdings Plc
0.82%
Frequently asked questions about EFAD and QEFA
How have the EFAD and QEFA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, EFAD is up 7.52% year-to-date (YTD), while QEFA has returned 12.67%. That puts QEFA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFAD or QEFA?
Year-to-date, the EFAD ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to -$9M for QEFA.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFAD or QEFA?
Over the past year, EFAD had a volatility of 11.71%, while QEFA experienced 11.15%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFAD or QEFA?
As of September 2, 2026, EFAD holds $63.56 M in assets under management (AUM), while QEFA manages $1.07 B.
What sectors do the EFAD and QEFA ETFs invest in?
EFAD leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, QEFA focuses on Finance, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the EFAD ETF and QEFA ETF?
EFAD top holdings include SEGRO PLC, Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and Pro Medicus Ltd.. QEFA holds in its top three: Novartis AG, ASML Holding NV and Roche Holding AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: EFAD or QEFA?
EFAD holds 73 securities with 22.86% of its assets in the top 15. QEFA has 625 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.19%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
