EFADvsQEFAETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QEFA
State Street SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.43%
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and State Street SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EFAD's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, QEFA's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. EFAD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.3% for QEFA. EFAD is up 9.22% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. QEFA performs better with 11.75% YTD performance, and -$24M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFAD and QEFA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EFAD vs QEFA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFAD QEFA | +2.82%+0.17% | +4.45%+2.56% | +9.22%+11.75% | +8.75%+15.92% | +41.31%+63.51% | +9.72%+52.09% |
| Flows | EFAD QEFA | -+$15M | --$30M | -$3M-$24M | -$7M-$20M | -$42M-$222M | -$59M-$29M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFAD QEFA | +10.03%+8.54% | +11.89%+11.37% | +12.52%+12.35% | +13.68%+13.58% |
| Max drawdown | EFAD QEFA | -5.70%-5.48% | -9.95%-9.43% | -15.06%-12.30% | -34.10%-27.15% |
| Max drawdown duration | EFAD QEFA | 52d52d | 149d149d | 236d38d | 1540d779d |
Trading data
EFAD | QEFA | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 7:02 PM | $44.60 | $98.88 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $44.41 | $99.30 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EFAD | QEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 7:02 PM
Live
Closed
EFAD | QEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.60 | $98.88 |
| 1D performance | +0.44% | -0.42% |
| AuM | $64.33 M | $1.04 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.3% |
Characteristics
EFAD | QEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Dividends Masters Index | MSCI EAFE Factor Mix A-Series Index |
| N° of holdings | 73 | 603 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 19, 2014 | June 4, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EFAD
Japan
22.76%
United Kingdom
13.55%
Switzerland
12.95%
Australia
12.29%
Other
38.46%
QEFA
Japan
23.12%
United Kingdom
13.72%
Switzerland
12.04%
France
7.6%
Germany
7.24%
Other
36.27%
Sectors
EFAD
Technology
19.84%
Healthcare
18.69%
Finance
15.12%
Non-Energy Materi.
12.51%
Industrials
7.88%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.72%
Other
18.24%
QEFA
Finance
22.43%
Industrials
12.82%
Healthcare
12.46%
Technology
10.79%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.54%
Other
30.97%
Advertisement
Diversification
EFAD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
23.89%
QEFA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.84%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
EFAD
CSL Ltd.
2.18%
Pro Medicus Ltd.
1.81%
SEGRO PLC
1.76%
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corp. Ltd.
1.68%
Sika AG
1.64%
Lotus Bakeries NV
1.53%
Northern Star Resources Ltd.
1.52%
The Sage Group plc
1.52%
Symrise AG
1.49%
ASML Holding NV
1.48%
Computershare Ltd.
1.47%
Bunzl Plc
1.46%
Kao Corp.
1.45%
SAP SE
1.45%
Givaudan SA
1.44%
QEFA
ASML Holding NV
2.04%
Novartis AG
1.95%
Roche Holding AG
1.83%
Nestlé SA
1.53%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.49%
Shell Plc
1.19%
Unilever Plc
1.17%
SAP SE
1.14%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.10%
Allianz SE
1.10%
Zurich Insurance Group AG
0.98%
Novo Nordisk A/S
0.88%
TotalEnergies SE
0.85%
ABB Ltd.
0.81%
GSK Plc
0.78%
Frequently asked questions about EFAD and QEFA
How have the EFAD and QEFA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, EFAD is up 9.22% year-to-date (YTD), while QEFA has returned 11.75%. That puts QEFA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFAD or QEFA?
Year-to-date, the EFAD ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to -$24M for QEFA.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFAD or QEFA?
Over the past year, EFAD had a volatility of 11.89%, while QEFA experienced 11.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFAD or QEFA?
As of October 16, 2026, EFAD holds $64.33 M in assets under management (AUM), while QEFA manages $1.04 B.
What sectors do the EFAD and QEFA ETFs invest in?
EFAD leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, QEFA focuses on Finance, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the EFAD ETF and QEFA ETF?
EFAD top holdings include CSL Ltd., Pro Medicus Ltd. and SEGRO PLC. QEFA holds in its top three: ASML Holding NV, Novartis AG and Roche Holding AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: EFAD or QEFA?
EFAD holds 73 securities with 23.89% of its assets in the top 15. QEFA has 611 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.84%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
