EFADvsIQSIETF Comparison
VS
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and NYLI Candriam International Equity ETF (IQSI) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EFAD's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, IQSI's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. EFAD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.16% for IQSI. EFAD is up 9% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. IQSI performs better with 10.02% YTD performance, and +$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFAD and IQSI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EFAD vs IQSI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/19/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFAD IQSI | +2.48%-1.23% | +5.09%+1.00% | +9.00%+10.02% | +7.98%+12.24% | +43.41%+64.09% | +8.53%+46.24% |
| Flows | EFAD IQSI | --$21M | --$7M | -$3M+$19M | -$7M+$5M | -$42M-$14M | -$59M-$5M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFAD IQSI | +10.02%+10.03% | +11.87%+13.86% | +12.51%+14.16% | +13.67%+15.26% |
| Max drawdown | EFAD IQSI | -5.70%-4.69% | -9.95%-11.51% | -15.06%-15.07% | -34.10%-28.97% |
| Max drawdown duration | EFAD IQSI | 55d64d | 149d103d | 236d214d | 1540d829d |
Trading data
EFAD | IQSI | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 2:32 PM | $44.70 | $37.83 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $44.60 | $37.83 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EFAD | IQSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 2:32 PM
Live
Closed
EFAD | IQSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.70 | $37.83 |
| 1D performance | +0.22% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $64.19 M | $251.52 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.16% |
Characteristics
EFAD | IQSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | New York Life Investments |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Dividends Masters Index | NYLI Candriam International Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 73 | 577 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 19, 2014 | December 17, 2019 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Exposure
Countries
EFAD
Japan
22.76%
United Kingdom
13.55%
Switzerland
12.95%
Australia
12.29%
Other
38.46%
IQSI
Japan
28.29%
Switzerland
10.85%
United Kingdom
10.24%
Australia
8.05%
Germany
7.33%
Other
35.23%
Sectors
EFAD
Technology
19.84%
Healthcare
18.69%
Finance
15.12%
Non-Energy Materi.
12.51%
Industrials
7.88%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.72%
Other
18.24%
IQSI
Finance
25.86%
Technology
17.99%
Industrials
13.6%
Healthcare
12.41%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.16%
Other
21.98%
Advertisement
Diversification
EFAD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
23.89%
IQSI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.61%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
EFAD
CSL Ltd.
2.18%
Pro Medicus Ltd.
1.81%
SEGRO PLC
1.76%
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corp. Ltd.
1.68%
Sika AG
1.64%
Lotus Bakeries NV
1.53%
Northern Star Resources Ltd.
1.52%
The Sage Group plc
1.52%
Symrise AG
1.49%
ASML Holding NV
1.48%
Computershare Ltd.
1.47%
Bunzl Plc
1.46%
Kao Corp.
1.45%
SAP SE
1.45%
Givaudan SA
1.44%
IQSI
ASML Holding NV
4.59%
Roche Holding AG
2.10%
Novartis AG
1.93%
Nestlé SA
1.80%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.64%
Siemens AG
1.59%
SAP SE
1.46%
Toyota Motor Corp.
1.43%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
1.31%
Schneider Electric SE
1.23%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.15%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
1.14%
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA
1.13%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.08%
Iberdrola SA
1.03%
Frequently asked questions about EFAD and IQSI
How have the EFAD and IQSI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 19, 2026, EFAD is up 9% year-to-date (YTD), while IQSI has returned 10.02%. That puts IQSI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFAD or IQSI?
Year-to-date, the EFAD ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to +$19M for IQSI.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFAD or IQSI?
Over the past year, EFAD had a volatility of 11.87%, while IQSI experienced 13.86%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFAD or IQSI?
As of October 19, 2026, EFAD holds $64.19 M in assets under management (AUM), while IQSI manages $251.52 M.
What sectors do the EFAD and IQSI ETFs invest in?
EFAD leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, IQSI focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the EFAD ETF and IQSI ETF?
EFAD top holdings include CSL Ltd., Pro Medicus Ltd. and SEGRO PLC. IQSI holds in its top three: ASML Holding NV, Roche Holding AG and Novartis AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: EFAD or IQSI?
EFAD holds 73 securities with 23.89% of its assets in the top 15. IQSI has 586 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.61%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
