EFADvsIQSIETF Comparison
VS
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and NYLI Candriam International Equity ETF (IQSI) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EFAD's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, IQSI's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. EFAD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.16% for IQSI. EFAD is up 7.52% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. IQSI performs better with 12.52% YTD performance, and +$32M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFAD and IQSI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EFAD vs IQSI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFAD IQSI | +0.97%+0.95% | +4.42%+3.02% | +7.52%+12.52% | +9.46%+20.98% | +31.43%+59.51% | +2.12%+46.55% |
| Flows | EFAD IQSI | -- | -+$19M | -$3M+$32M | -$11M+$20M | -$42M-$744K | -$59M+$7M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFAD IQSI | +9.76%+11.56% | +11.71%+13.74% | +12.57%+14.24% | +13.67%+15.26% |
| Max drawdown | EFAD IQSI | -2.60%-2.53% | -9.95%-11.51% | -15.06%-15.07% | -35.77%-29.34% |
| Max drawdown duration | EFAD IQSI | 21d28d | 149d103d | 236d214d | 1633d892d |
Trading data
EFAD | IQSI | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.01 | $39.35 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $44.45 | $38.92 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EFAD | IQSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EFAD | IQSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.01 | $39.35 |
| 1D performance | +1.26% | +1.09% |
| AuM | $63.56 M | $270.79 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.16% |
Characteristics
EFAD | IQSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | New York Life Investments |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Dividends Masters Index | NYLI Candriam International Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 73 | 577 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 19, 2014 | December 17, 2019 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EFAD
Japan
23.62%
United Kingdom
13.58%
Switzerland
13.01%
Australia
11.24%
Other
38.56%
IQSI
Japan
27.92%
Switzerland
11.19%
United Kingdom
10.41%
Australia
8.28%
Germany
7.23%
Other
34.97%
Sectors
EFAD
Technology
19.97%
Healthcare
17.75%
Finance
15.94%
Non-Energy Materi.
12.24%
Industrials
7.83%
Utilities
7.77%
Other
18.5%
IQSI
Finance
26.15%
Technology
17.23%
Industrials
13.66%
Healthcare
12.57%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.43%
Other
21.97%
Advertisement
Diversification
EFAD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
22.86%
IQSI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.9%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
EFAD
SEGRO PLC
1.84%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
1.65%
Pro Medicus Ltd.
1.59%
Computershare Ltd.
1.54%
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corp. Ltd.
1.52%
Lasertec Corp.
1.52%
FUJIFILM Holdings Corp.
1.51%
CSL Ltd.
1.51%
Bunzl Plc
1.48%
Sonic Healthcare Ltd.
1.48%
ASML Holding NV
1.45%
Symrise AG
1.45%
Givaudan SA
1.44%
Novo Nordisk A/S
1.44%
Sika AG
1.44%
IQSI
ASML Holding NV
4.59%
Roche Holding AG
2.15%
Novartis AG
2.02%
Nestlé SA
1.89%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.76%
Siemens AG
1.60%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
1.46%
Toyota Motor Corp.
1.42%
Schneider Electric SE
1.23%
SAP SE
1.22%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.16%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
1.15%
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA
1.10%
Iberdrola SA
1.07%
ABB Ltd.
1.06%
Frequently asked questions about EFAD and IQSI
How have the EFAD and IQSI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, EFAD is up 7.52% year-to-date (YTD), while IQSI has returned 12.52%. That puts IQSI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFAD or IQSI?
Year-to-date, the EFAD ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to +$32M for IQSI.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFAD or IQSI?
Over the past year, EFAD had a volatility of 11.71%, while IQSI experienced 13.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFAD or IQSI?
As of September 2, 2026, EFAD holds $63.56 M in assets under management (AUM), while IQSI manages $270.79 M.
What sectors do the EFAD and IQSI ETFs invest in?
EFAD leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, IQSI focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the EFAD ETF and IQSI ETF?
EFAD top holdings include SEGRO PLC, Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and Pro Medicus Ltd.. IQSI holds in its top three: ASML Holding NV, Roche Holding AG and Novartis AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: EFAD or IQSI?
EFAD holds 73 securities with 22.86% of its assets in the top 15. IQSI has 586 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.9%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
