EFADvsGSIDETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
GSID
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.06%
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EFAD's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, GSID's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. EFAD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.25% for GSID. EFAD is up 7.52% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. GSID performs better with 13.03% YTD performance, and +$9M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFAD and GSID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EFAD vs GSID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFAD GSID | +0.97%+0.61% | +4.42%+3.62% | +7.52%+13.03% | +9.46%+22.21% | +31.43%+65.78% | +2.12%+52.37% |
| Flows | EFAD GSID | --$31M | -+$14M | -$3M+$9M | -$11M+$76M | -$42M+$267M | -$59M+$393M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFAD GSID | +9.76%+11.22% | +11.71%+13.50% | +12.57%+14.14% | +13.67%+15.37% |
| Max drawdown | EFAD GSID | -2.60%-2.55% | -9.95%-10.70% | -15.06%-14.37% | -35.77%-29.33% |
| Max drawdown duration | EFAD GSID | 21d15d | 149d103d | 236d42d | 1633d897d |
Trading data
EFAD | GSID | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.01 | $78.31 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $44.45 | $77.43 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EFAD | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EFAD | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.01 | $78.31 |
| 1D performance | +1.26% | +1.14% |
| AuM | $63.56 M | $1.08 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
EFAD | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Dividends Masters Index | Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 73 | 860 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 19, 2014 | May 12, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EFAD
Japan
23.62%
United Kingdom
13.58%
Switzerland
13.01%
Australia
11.24%
Other
38.56%
GSID
Japan
25.67%
United Kingdom
13.47%
Switzerland
8.99%
Germany
8.06%
France
7.44%
Australia
7.09%
Other
29.28%
Sectors
EFAD
Technology
19.97%
Healthcare
17.75%
Finance
15.94%
Non-Energy Materi.
12.24%
Industrials
7.83%
Utilities
7.77%
Other
18.5%
GSID
Finance
26%
Industrials
15.67%
Technology
11.65%
Healthcare
9.38%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.17%
Other
29.14%
Diversification
EFAD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
22.86%
GSID
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
17.78%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
EFAD
SEGRO PLC
1.84%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
1.65%
Pro Medicus Ltd.
1.59%
Computershare Ltd.
1.54%
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corp. Ltd.
1.52%
Lasertec Corp.
1.52%
FUJIFILM Holdings Corp.
1.51%
CSL Ltd.
1.51%
Bunzl Plc
1.48%
Sonic Healthcare Ltd.
1.48%
ASML Holding NV
1.45%
Symrise AG
1.45%
Givaudan SA
1.44%
Novo Nordisk A/S
1.44%
Sika AG
1.44%
GSID
ASML Holding NV
2.78%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.60%
Roche Holding AG
1.39%
Novartis AG
1.28%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.18%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.16%
Nestlé SA
1.14%
Shell Plc
1.10%
Siemens AG
1.00%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.94%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
0.93%
Toyota Motor Corp.
0.86%
Allianz SE
0.84%
SAP SE
0.79%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
0.78%
Frequently asked questions about EFAD and GSID
How have the EFAD and GSID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, EFAD is up 7.52% year-to-date (YTD), while GSID has returned 13.03%. That puts GSID better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFAD or GSID?
Year-to-date, the EFAD ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to +$9M for GSID.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFAD or GSID?
Over the past year, EFAD had a volatility of 11.71%, while GSID experienced 13.5%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFAD or GSID?
As of September 2, 2026, EFAD holds $63.56 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSID manages $1.08 B.
What sectors do the EFAD and GSID ETFs invest in?
EFAD leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, GSID focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the EFAD ETF and GSID ETF?
EFAD top holdings include SEGRO PLC, Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and Pro Medicus Ltd.. GSID holds in its top three: ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc and Roche Holding AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: EFAD or GSID?
EFAD holds 73 securities with 22.86% of its assets in the top 15. GSID has 874 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.78%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
