EFADvsFNDFETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.5%
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EFAD's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, FNDF's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Energy. EFAD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.25% for FNDF. EFAD is up 4.37% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. FNDF performs better with 16.99% YTD performance, and +$1.39B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFAD and FNDF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EFAD vs FNDF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFAD FNDF | +0.80%-2.64% | -0.66%+2.58% | +4.37%+16.99% | +6.03%+36.81% | +23.45%+77.62% | +5.33%+96.11% |
| Flows | EFAD FNDF | -+$372M | -$1M+$789M | -$3M+$1.39B | -$11M+$2.38B | -$42M+$5.29B | -$59M+$8.97B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFAD FNDF | +10.15%+14.56% | +11.87%+14.27% | +12.60%+14.05% | +13.68%+14.78% |
| Max drawdown | EFAD FNDF | -4.74%-4.43% | -9.95%-10.49% | -15.06%-13.78% | -35.77%-25.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | EFAD FNDF | 74d44d | 138d65d | 236d44d | 1633d545d |
Trading data
EFAD | FNDF | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $43.14 | $52.74 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $43.11 | $52.83 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EFAD | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EFAD | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.14 | $52.74 |
| 1D performance | +0.07% | -0.17% |
| AuM | $61.69 M | $24.22 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
EFAD | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Dividends Masters Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index |
| N° of holdings | 75 | 857 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 19, 2014 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EFAD
Japan
26.07%
United Kingdom
13.57%
Switzerland
12.11%
Australia
9.92%
Other
38.33%
FNDF
Japan
22.6%
United Kingdom
12.93%
Republic of Korea
11.71%
Canada
8.55%
France
7.66%
Germany
7.35%
Other
29.2%
Sectors
EFAD
Technology
23.07%
Healthcare
15.42%
Finance
15.01%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.93%
Industrials
7.94%
Utilities
7.59%
Other
19.05%
FNDF
Finance
17.9%
Technology
13.79%
Energy
12.67%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.61%
Industrials
11.45%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.51%
Other
23.08%
Advertisement
Diversification
EFAD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
23.63%
FNDF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.56%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
EFAD
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
2.55%
Logitech International SA
1.62%
London Stock Exchange Group Plc
1.60%
Lasertec Corp.
1.56%
Terumo Corp.
1.54%
Deutsche Börse AG
1.51%
Halma Plc
1.51%
ASML Holding NV
1.50%
Washington H. Soul Pattinson & Co. Ltd.
1.50%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
1.48%
APA Group
1.48%
Bunzl Plc
1.46%
Computershare Ltd.
1.45%
The Sage Group plc
1.43%
RELX Plc
1.42%
FNDF
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
5.34%
Shell Plc
2.29%
TotalEnergies SE
1.80%
Glencore Plc
1.29%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.23%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.20%
BP Plc
1.12%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.02%
Toyota Motor Corp.
0.90%
Roche Holding AG
0.83%
Rio Tinto Plc
0.81%
Banco Santander SA
0.74%
Nestlé SA
0.68%
Mitsubishi Corp.
0.65%
Mercedes-Benz Group AG
0.65%
Frequently asked questions about EFAD and FNDF
How have the EFAD and FNDF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, EFAD is up 4.37% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDF has returned 16.99%. That puts FNDF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFAD or FNDF?
Year-to-date, the EFAD ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to +$1.39B for FNDF.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFAD or FNDF?
Over the past year, EFAD had a volatility of 11.87%, while FNDF experienced 14.27%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFAD or FNDF?
As of July 17, 2026, EFAD holds $61.69 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNDF manages $24.22 B.
What sectors do the EFAD and FNDF ETFs invest in?
EFAD leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, FNDF focuses on Finance, Technology and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the EFAD ETF and FNDF ETF?
EFAD top holdings include Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Logitech International SA and London Stock Exchange Group Plc. FNDF holds in its top three: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Shell Plc and TotalEnergies SE.
Which ETF is more diversified: EFAD or FNDF?
EFAD holds 75 securities with 23.63% of its assets in the top 15. FNDF has 876 securities and a top 15 weight of 20.56%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
