EFADvsEFAXETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
EFAX
State Street SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.43%
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and State Street SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (EFAX) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EFAD's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, EFAX's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. EFAD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.2% for EFAX. EFAD is up 9% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. EFAX performs worse with 7.26% YTD performance, and -$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFAD and EFAX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EFAD vs EFAX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/19/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFAD EFAX | +2.48%-2.29% | +5.09%-0.12% | +9.00%+7.26% | +7.98%+10.14% | +43.41%+68.20% | +8.53%+46.08% |
| Flows | EFAD EFAX | -- | -- | -$3M-$5M | -$7M+$35M | -$42M+$130M | -$59M+$148M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFAD EFAX | +10.02%+10.65% | +11.87%+14.61% | +12.51%+14.43% | +13.67%+15.54% |
| Max drawdown | EFAD EFAX | -5.70%-6.57% | -9.95%-11.82% | -15.06%-14.22% | -34.10%-30.78% |
| Max drawdown duration | EFAD EFAX | 55d64d | 149d103d | 236d53d | 1540d843d |
Trading data
EFAD | EFAX | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $44.54 | $53.29 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $44.60 | $52.89 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EFAD | EFAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EFAD | EFAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.54 | $53.29 |
| 1D performance | -0.13% | +0.76% |
| AuM | $64.19 M | $490.37 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.2% |
Characteristics
EFAD | EFAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Dividends Masters Index | MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index |
| N° of holdings | 73 | 598 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 19, 2014 | October 24, 2016 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EFAD
Japan
22.76%
United Kingdom
13.55%
Switzerland
12.95%
Australia
12.29%
Other
38.46%
EFAX
Japan
23.77%
United Kingdom
12.51%
Switzerland
10.32%
Germany
9.29%
France
8.3%
Other
35.79%
Sectors
EFAD
Technology
19.84%
Healthcare
18.69%
Finance
15.12%
Non-Energy Materi.
12.51%
Industrials
7.88%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.72%
Other
18.24%
EFAX
Finance
27.87%
Industrials
15.99%
Technology
13.94%
Healthcare
10.48%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.8%
Other
23.92%
Advertisement
Diversification
EFAD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
23.89%
EFAX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.03%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
EFAD
CSL Ltd.
2.18%
Pro Medicus Ltd.
1.81%
SEGRO PLC
1.76%
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corp. Ltd.
1.68%
Sika AG
1.64%
Lotus Bakeries NV
1.53%
Northern Star Resources Ltd.
1.52%
The Sage Group plc
1.52%
Symrise AG
1.49%
ASML Holding NV
1.48%
Computershare Ltd.
1.47%
Bunzl Plc
1.46%
Kao Corp.
1.45%
SAP SE
1.45%
Givaudan SA
1.44%
EFAX
ASML Holding NV
3.18%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.73%
Roche Holding AG
1.49%
Novartis AG
1.36%
Nestlé SA
1.22%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.20%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.19%
Siemens AG
1.17%
SAP SE
1.09%
Allianz SE
0.97%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
0.93%
Schneider Electric SE
0.91%
Toyota Motor Corp.
0.91%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
0.84%
UBS Group AG
0.83%
Frequently asked questions about EFAD and EFAX
How have the EFAD and EFAX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 19, 2026, EFAD is up 9% year-to-date (YTD), while EFAX has returned 7.26%. That puts EFAD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFAD or EFAX?
Year-to-date, the EFAD ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to -$5M for EFAX.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFAD or EFAX?
Over the past year, EFAD had a volatility of 11.87%, while EFAX experienced 14.61%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFAD or EFAX?
As of October 19, 2026, EFAD holds $64.19 M in assets under management (AUM), while EFAX manages $490.37 M.
What sectors do the EFAD and EFAX ETFs invest in?
EFAD leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, EFAX focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the EFAD ETF and EFAX ETF?
EFAD top holdings include CSL Ltd., Pro Medicus Ltd. and SEGRO PLC. EFAX holds in its top three: ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc and Roche Holding AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: EFAD or EFAX?
EFAD holds 73 securities with 23.89% of its assets in the top 15. EFAX has 609 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.03%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
