EFADvsEASGETF Comparison
VS
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF (EASG) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EFAD's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, EASG's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. EFAD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.14% for EASG. EFAD is up 7.52% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. EASG performs better with 12.04% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFAD and EASG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EFAD vs EASG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFAD EASG | +0.97%+0.58% | +4.42%+2.89% | +7.52%+12.04% | +9.46%+20.94% | +31.43%+55.14% | +2.12%+40.37% |
| Flows | EFAD EASG | -- | --$2M | -$3M-$2M | -$11M-$2M | -$42M+$6M | -$59M+$33M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFAD EASG | +9.76%+10.94% | +11.71%+13.91% | +12.57%+14.46% | +13.67%+15.51% |
| Max drawdown | EFAD EASG | -2.60%-2.41% | -9.95%-11.19% | -15.06%-17.25% | -35.77%-31.12% |
| Max drawdown duration | EFAD EASG | 21d15d | 149d103d | 236d232d | 1633d905d |
Trading data
EFAD | EASG | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.01 | $39.29 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $44.45 | $38.92 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EFAD | EASG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EFAD | EASG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.01 | $39.29 |
| 1D performance | +1.26% | +0.95% |
| AuM | $63.56 M | $68.11 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.14% |
Characteristics
EFAD | EASG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Dividends Masters Index | MSCI EAFE Selection Index |
| N° of holdings | 73 | 463 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 19, 2014 | September 6, 2018 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EFAD
Japan
23.62%
United Kingdom
13.58%
Switzerland
13.01%
Australia
11.24%
Other
38.56%
EASG
Japan
23.93%
United Kingdom
14.64%
France
11.75%
Switzerland
9.3%
Netherlands
8.47%
Other
31.91%
Sectors
EFAD
Technology
19.97%
Healthcare
17.75%
Finance
15.94%
Non-Energy Materi.
12.24%
Industrials
7.83%
Utilities
7.77%
Other
18.5%
EASG
Finance
28.17%
Technology
14.54%
Industrials
13.17%
Healthcare
10.32%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.49%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.07%
Other
18.24%
Advertisement
Diversification
EFAD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
22.86%
EASG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.09%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
EFAD
SEGRO PLC
1.84%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
1.65%
Pro Medicus Ltd.
1.59%
Computershare Ltd.
1.54%
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corp. Ltd.
1.52%
Lasertec Corp.
1.52%
FUJIFILM Holdings Corp.
1.51%
CSL Ltd.
1.51%
Bunzl Plc
1.48%
Sonic Healthcare Ltd.
1.48%
ASML Holding NV
1.45%
Symrise AG
1.45%
Givaudan SA
1.44%
Novo Nordisk A/S
1.44%
Sika AG
1.44%
EASG
ASML Holding NV
5.44%
HSBC Holdings Plc
3.13%
Novartis AG
2.58%
AstraZeneca PLC
2.30%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
1.84%
Allianz SE
1.65%
TotalEnergies SE
1.47%
Novo Nordisk A/S
1.46%
Schneider Electric SE
1.45%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
1.37%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.35%
ABB Ltd.
1.31%
Iberdrola SA
1.29%
Unilever Plc
1.28%
LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE
1.18%
Frequently asked questions about EFAD and EASG
How have the EFAD and EASG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, EFAD is up 7.52% year-to-date (YTD), while EASG has returned 12.04%. That puts EASG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFAD or EASG?
Year-to-date, the EFAD ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to -$2M for EASG.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFAD or EASG?
Over the past year, EFAD had a volatility of 11.71%, while EASG experienced 13.91%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFAD or EASG?
As of September 2, 2026, EFAD holds $63.56 M in assets under management (AUM), while EASG manages $68.11 M.
What sectors do the EFAD and EASG ETFs invest in?
EFAD leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, EASG focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the EFAD ETF and EASG ETF?
EFAD top holdings include SEGRO PLC, Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and Pro Medicus Ltd.. EASG holds in its top three: ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc and Novartis AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: EFAD or EASG?
EFAD holds 73 securities with 22.86% of its assets in the top 15. EASG has 469 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.09%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
