EFADvsDMXUETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
DMXU
Xtrackers Bloomberg Developed Markets ex US Equity ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.43%
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Developed Markets ex US Equity ETF (DMXU) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EFAD's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, DMXU's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. EFAD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.03% for DMXU. EFAD is up 9.22% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. DMXU performs worse with 8.06% YTD performance, and -$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFAD and DMXU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EFAD vs DMXU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFAD DMXU | +2.82%-2.26% | +4.45%-2.44% | +9.22%+8.06% | +8.75%+10.48% | +41.31%+55.22% | +9.72%+39.63% |
| Flows | EFAD DMXU | --$6M | --$5M | -$3M-$7M | -$7M-$7M | -$42M-$859K | -$59M+$26M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFAD DMXU | +10.03%+9.88% | +11.89%+14.08% | +12.52%+14.36% | +13.68%+15.50% |
| Max drawdown | EFAD DMXU | -5.70%-6.32% | -9.95%-11.19% | -15.06%-17.25% | -34.10%-30.95% |
| Max drawdown duration | EFAD DMXU | 52d61d | 149d103d | 236d232d | 1540d843d |
Trading data
EFAD | DMXU | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 7:02 PM | $44.60 | |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $44.41 | |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EFAD | DMXU | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 7:02 PM
Live
Closed
EFAD | DMXU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.60 | – |
| 1D performance | +0.44% | – |
| AuM | $64.33 M | $60.06 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.03% |
Characteristics
EFAD | DMXU | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Dividends Masters Index | Bloomberg Developed Markets ex US Core Markets Index |
| N° of holdings | 73 | 450 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 19, 2014 | September 6, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EFAD
Japan
22.76%
United Kingdom
13.55%
Switzerland
12.95%
Australia
12.29%
Other
38.46%
DMXU
Japan
24.59%
United Kingdom
14.08%
France
11.59%
Switzerland
9.03%
Netherlands
8.69%
Other
32.02%
Sectors
EFAD
Technology
19.84%
Healthcare
18.69%
Finance
15.12%
Non-Energy Materi.
12.51%
Industrials
7.88%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.72%
Other
18.24%
DMXU
Finance
27.17%
Technology
15.54%
Industrials
13.83%
Healthcare
9.85%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.26%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.48%
Other
17.87%
Advertisement
Diversification
EFAD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
23.89%
DMXU
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.82%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
EFAD
CSL Ltd.
2.18%
Pro Medicus Ltd.
1.81%
SEGRO PLC
1.76%
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corp. Ltd.
1.68%
Sika AG
1.64%
Lotus Bakeries NV
1.53%
Northern Star Resources Ltd.
1.52%
The Sage Group plc
1.52%
Symrise AG
1.49%
ASML Holding NV
1.48%
Computershare Ltd.
1.47%
Bunzl Plc
1.46%
Kao Corp.
1.45%
SAP SE
1.45%
Givaudan SA
1.44%
DMXU
ASML Holding NV
5.76%
HSBC Holdings Plc
3.04%
Novartis AG
2.40%
AstraZeneca PLC
2.10%
Allianz SE
1.71%
Schneider Electric SE
1.64%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
1.61%
TotalEnergies SE
1.46%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
1.35%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.34%
ABB Ltd.
1.32%
Hitachi Ltd.
1.31%
Novo Nordisk A/S
1.27%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.27%
Iberdrola SA
1.25%
Frequently asked questions about EFAD and DMXU
How have the EFAD and DMXU ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, EFAD is up 9.22% year-to-date (YTD), while DMXU has returned 8.06%. That puts EFAD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFAD or DMXU?
Year-to-date, the EFAD ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to -$7M for DMXU.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFAD or DMXU?
Over the past year, EFAD had a volatility of 11.89%, while DMXU experienced 14.08%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFAD or DMXU?
As of October 16, 2026, EFAD holds $64.33 M in assets under management (AUM), while DMXU manages $60.06 M.
What sectors do the EFAD and DMXU ETFs invest in?
EFAD leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, DMXU focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the EFAD ETF and DMXU ETF?
EFAD top holdings include CSL Ltd., Pro Medicus Ltd. and SEGRO PLC. DMXU holds in its top three: ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc and Novartis AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: EFAD or DMXU?
EFAD holds 73 securities with 23.89% of its assets in the top 15. DMXU has 455 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.82%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
