Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EEMXvsGEMETF Comparison
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (EEMX) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. EEMX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.54% for GEM. EEMX is up 6.44% year-to-date (YTD) with +$41M in YTD flows. GEM performs better with 8.35% YTD performance, and +$82M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EEMX and GEM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EEMX vs GEM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EEMX GEM | -5.01%-2.91% | +7.60%+10.68% | +6.44%+8.35% | +37.15%+38.97% | +66.69%+67.09% | +25.36%+29.16% |
| Flows | EEMX GEM | +$41M+$35M | +$41M+$100M | +$41M+$82M | +$30M+$170M | +$6M+$22M | -$19M-$381M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EEMX GEM | +22.04%+20.74% | +17.67%+17.06% | +15.20%+14.08% | +16.34%+14.80% |
| Max drawdown | EEMX GEM | -10.46%-10.19% | -13.50%-12.81% | -15.97%-14.73% | -36.94%-35.04% |
| Max drawdown duration | EEMX GEM | 14d13d | 52d45d | 240d223d | 1507d1485d |
EEMX | GEM | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 7:59 PM | $44.62 | $43.29 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $46.18 | $43.17 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EEMX | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EEMX | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.62 | $43.29 |
| 1D performance | -3.37% | +0.29% |
| AuM | $136.14 M | $1.37 B |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.54% |
EEMX | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | MSCI Emerging Markets ex Fossil Fuels Index | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 960 | 702 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 24, 2016 | September 25, 2015 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EEMX and GEM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, EEMX is up 6.44% year-to-date (YTD), while GEM has returned 8.35%. That puts GEM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EEMX or GEM?
Year-to-date, the EEMX ETF saw +$41M in flows, compared to +$82M for GEM.
Which ETF is more volatile: EEMX or GEM?
Over the past year, EEMX had a volatility of 17.67%, while GEM experienced 17.06%.
Which ETF is bigger: EEMX or GEM?
As of March 12, 2026, EEMX holds $136.14 M in assets under management (AUM), while GEM manages $1.37 B.
What sectors do the EEMX and GEM ETFs invest in?
EEMX leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GEM focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the EEMX ETF and GEM ETF?
EEMX top holdings include TWN SEMICONT MAN, SAMSUNG ELECTR and TENCENT HOLDINGS. GEM holds in its top three: TWN SEMICONT MAN, SAMSUNG ELECTR and TENCENT HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: EEMX or GEM?
EEMX holds 1039 securities with 37.28% of its assets in the top 15. GEM has 756 securities and a top 15 weight of 32.82%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
