Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EEMVvsPXHETF Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. EEMV's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. In contrast, PXH's top sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Materials. EEMV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.49% for PXH. EEMV is up 1.44% year-to-date (YTD) with -$618M in YTD flows. PXH performs better with 5.35% YTD performance, and +$38M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EEMV and PXH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EEMV vs PXH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EEMV PXH | -4.30%-3.16% | +3.41%+8.28% | +1.44%+5.35% | +14.16%+24.70% | +34.73%+75.37% | +16.87%+48.87% |
| Flows | EEMV PXH | --$12M | -$618M+$49M | -$618M+$38M | -$1.41B+$267M | -$2.28B+$38M | -$1.26B+$312M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EEMV PXH | +11.78%+15.13% | +9.58%+15.47% | +8.48%+14.58% | +9.56%+15.21% |
| Max drawdown | EEMV PXH | -7.18%-7.37% | -7.18%-15.87% | -11.09%-16.17% | -22.07%-29.08% |
| Max drawdown duration | EEMV PXH | 19d19d | 19d54d | 252d218d | 1192d822d |
EEMV | PXH | |
Last sale 3/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $65.18 | $27.14 |
| Previous close 03/16/2026 | $64.17 | $26.62 |
| Consolidated volume 03/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EEMV | PXH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EEMV | PXH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.18 | $27.14 |
| 1D performance | +1.57% | +1.95% |
| AuM | $3.24 B | $1.87 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.49% |
EEMV | PXH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Invesco |
| Benchmark | MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index | RAFI Fundamental Select Emerging Markets 350 Index |
| N° of holdings | 302 | 330 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 18, 2011 | September 27, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EEMV and PXH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 16, 2026, EEMV is up 1.44% year-to-date (YTD), while PXH has returned 5.35%. That puts PXH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EEMV or PXH?
Year-to-date, the EEMV ETF saw -$618M in flows, compared to +$38M for PXH.
Which ETF is more volatile: EEMV or PXH?
Over the past year, EEMV had a volatility of 9.58%, while PXH experienced 15.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: EEMV or PXH?
As of March 16, 2026, EEMV holds $3.24 B in assets under management (AUM), while PXH manages $1.87 B.
What sectors do the EEMV and PXH ETFs invest in?
EEMV leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. Meanwhile, PXH focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Materials.
What are the top holdings of the EEMV ETF and PXH ETF?
EEMV top holdings include DELTA ELECTRONIC, TWN SEMICONT MAN and SK HYNIX. PXH holds in its top three: TWN SEMICONT MAN, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and PETROLEO BRASILEIRO PRF.
Which ETF is more diversified: EEMV or PXH?
EEMV holds 320 securities with 19.83% of its assets in the top 15. PXH has 354 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.56%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.