EEMOvsMFEMETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
MFEM
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
This fund is part of
Uncategorized Equities
+1.14%
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) belongs to the EM Large & Mid Cap segment. PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Non-Energy Materials. EEMO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.5% for MFEM. EEMO is up 27.46% year-to-date (YTD) with +$12M in YTD flows. MFEM performs worse with 24.73% YTD performance, and +$16M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EEMO and MFEM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EEMO vs MFEM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EEMO MFEM | -1.13%-0.23% | -7.31%-0.92% | +27.46%+24.73% | +23.57%+29.50% | +64.54%+74.12% | +40.13%+52.14% |
| Flows | EEMO MFEM | -$1M- | +$7M+$6M | +$12M+$16M | +$9M+$20M | +$17M+$15M | +$16M-$161M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EEMO MFEM | +50.57%+23.60% | +36.35%+20.94% | +24.61%+15.95% | +20.89%+15.52% |
| Max drawdown | EEMO MFEM | -28.36%-12.90% | -28.36%-16.28% | -28.36%-17.06% | -28.36%-30.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | EEMO MFEM | 87d75d | 87d107d | 87d247d | 87d987d |
Trading data
EEMO | MFEM | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $22.30 | $28.50 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $22.28 | $28.49 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EEMO | MFEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EEMO | MFEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.30 | $28.50 |
| 1D performance | +0.07% | +0.04% |
| AuM | $25.62 M | $157.96 M |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.5% |
Characteristics
EEMO | MFEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | PIMCO |
| Benchmark | S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index | RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Index |
| N° of holdings | 241 | 658 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 24, 2012 | August 31, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EEMO
Republic of Korea
42.63%
Taiwan
14.69%
China
11.12%
Brazil
7.6%
Other
23.97%
MFEM
Taiwan
24.89%
China
24.31%
Republic of Korea
18.76%
Other
32.04%
Sectors
EEMO
Technology
40.02%
Finance
25.38%
Non-Energy Materi.
14.45%
Industrials
7.65%
Other
12.5%
MFEM
Technology
29.9%
Finance
18.14%
Non-Energy Materi.
14.45%
Energy
8.74%
Industrials
8.59%
Other
20.18%
Advertisement
Diversification
EEMO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
46.54%
MFEM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
22.6%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
EEMO
SK hynix, Inc.
12.26%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
8.99%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
4.50%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
3.69%
SK Square Co. Ltd.
3.69%
Vale SA
1.86%
Itaú Unibanco Holding SA
1.61%
Elite Material Co., Ltd.
1.48%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.39%
OTP Bank Nyrt
1.20%
Hyundai Motor Co.
1.20%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
1.19%
Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.
1.19%
Credicorp Ltd.
1.16%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
1.13%
MFEM
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
2.48%
MediaTek, Inc.
2.15%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
2.04%
Hyundai Motor Co.
1.89%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
1.51%
Lenovo Group Ltd.
1.43%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.39%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.39%
Accton Technology Corp.
1.31%
Petróleo Brasileiro SA
1.25%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
1.25%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
1.19%
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
1.16%
Nan Ya Plastics Corp.
1.12%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.04%
Frequently asked questions about EEMO and MFEM
How have the EEMO and MFEM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 17, 2026, EEMO is up 27.46% year-to-date (YTD), while MFEM has returned 24.73%. That puts EEMO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EEMO or MFEM?
Year-to-date, the EEMO ETF saw +$12M in flows, compared to +$16M for MFEM.
Which ETF is more volatile: EEMO or MFEM?
Over the past year, EEMO had a volatility of 36.35%, while MFEM experienced 20.94%.
Which ETF is bigger: EEMO or MFEM?
As of September 17, 2026, EEMO holds $25.62 M in assets under management (AUM), while MFEM manages $157.96 M.
What sectors do the EEMO and MFEM ETFs invest in?
EEMO leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, MFEM focuses on Technology, Finance and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the EEMO ETF and MFEM ETF?
EEMO top holdings include SK hynix, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. MFEM holds in its top three: ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd., MediaTek, Inc. and Delta Electronics, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: EEMO or MFEM?
EEMO holds 253 securities with 46.54% of its assets in the top 15. MFEM has 659 securities and a top 15 weight of 22.6%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
