EEMAvsGEMETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
GEM
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
This fund is part of
EM Large & Mid Cap
-0.18%
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. EEMA's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, GEM's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Non-Energy Materials. EEMA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.59% for GEM. EEMA is up 22.25% year-to-date (YTD) with -$983M in YTD flows. GEM performs worse with 21.27% YTD performance, and +$260M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EEMA and GEM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EEMA vs GEM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/05/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EEMA GEM | -1.91%-1.70% | +2.47%+0.32% | +22.25%+21.27% | +38.60%+36.27% | +78.51%+75.24% | +43.12%+46.68% |
| Flows | EEMA GEM | -$23M+$22M | -$510M+$98M | -$983M+$260M | -$965M+$303M | -$239M+$147M | -$386M+$82M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EEMA GEM | +30.94%+28.93% | +22.18%+22.60% | +18.32%+17.27% | +18.92%+16.64% |
| Max drawdown | EEMA GEM | -12.67%-12.49% | -13.77%-13.50% | -18.37%-14.73% | -37.93%-32.76% |
| Max drawdown duration | EEMA GEM | 64d44d | 55d57d | 242d223d | 1394d1368d |
Trading data
EEMA | GEM | |
Last sale 8/6/2026 at 2:08 PM | $113.98 | $49.98 |
| Previous close 08/05/2026 | $114.13 | $50.25 |
| Consolidated volume 08/05/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EEMA | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/6/2026 at 2:08 PM
Live
Closed
EEMA | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $113.98 | $49.98 |
| 1D performance | -0.13% | -0.54% |
| AuM | $858.60 M | $1.72 B |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
EEMA | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | MSCI EM Asia Custom Capped Index | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 832 | 719 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 8, 2012 | September 25, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EEMA
Taiwan
31.33%
China
26.87%
Republic of Korea
19.14%
India
15.76%
Other
6.9%
GEM
Taiwan
23.81%
Republic of Korea
20.86%
China
17.54%
India
9.91%
Other
27.88%
Sectors
EEMA
Technology
47.53%
Finance
18.2%
Industrials
7.83%
Other
26.45%
GEM
Technology
43.36%
Finance
19.28%
Other
37.36%
Advertisement
Diversification
EEMA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
42.52%
GEM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
37.63%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
EEMA
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
15.00%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
5.47%
SK hynix, Inc.
4.12%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
3.33%
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
2.87%
MediaTek, Inc.
2.04%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
2.00%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
1.21%
SK Square Co. Ltd.
1.04%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
1.01%
China Construction Bank Corp.
1.00%
HDFC Bank Ltd.
0.98%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
0.84%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
0.82%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
0.79%
GEM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
13.77%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
7.29%
SK hynix, Inc.
6.29%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
2.48%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
1.36%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.33%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
0.81%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
0.73%
China Construction Bank Corp.
0.67%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
0.66%
HDFC Bank Ltd.
0.53%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
0.47%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
0.46%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
0.40%
Itaú Unibanco Holding SA
0.37%
Frequently asked questions about EEMA and GEM
How have the EEMA and GEM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 5, 2026, EEMA is up 22.25% year-to-date (YTD), while GEM has returned 21.27%. That puts EEMA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EEMA or GEM?
Year-to-date, the EEMA ETF saw -$983M in flows, compared to +$260M for GEM.
Which ETF is more volatile: EEMA or GEM?
Over the past year, EEMA had a volatility of 22.18%, while GEM experienced 22.6%.
Which ETF is bigger: EEMA or GEM?
As of August 5, 2026, EEMA holds $858.60 M in assets under management (AUM), while GEM manages $1.72 B.
What sectors do the EEMA and GEM ETFs invest in?
EEMA leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, GEM focuses on Technology and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the EEMA ETF and GEM ETF?
EEMA top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc.. GEM holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: EEMA or GEM?
EEMA holds 883 securities with 42.52% of its assets in the top 15. GEM has 741 securities and a top 15 weight of 37.63%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
