EEMAvsFLAXETF Comparison
VS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) belongs to the EM Large & Mid Cap segment. Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. EEMA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.19% for FLAX. EEMA is up 29.21% year-to-date (YTD) with -$578M in YTD flows. FLAX performs better with 29.43% YTD performance, and +$6M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EEMA and FLAX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EEMA vs FLAX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EEMA FLAX | +8.60%+7.81% | +22.62%+18.70% | +29.21%+29.43% | +53.52%+52.96% | +91.19%+90.34% | +46.06%+47.99% |
| Flows | EEMA FLAX | -$105M- | -$105M- | -$578M+$6M | -$518M+$6M | +$139M+$2M | -$16M+$7M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EEMA FLAX | +28.61%+29.54% | +20.02%+20.98% | +17.59%+17.61% | +18.53%+17.99% |
| Max drawdown | EEMA FLAX | -8.23%-8.99% | -13.77%-13.64% | -18.37%-16.29% | -40.21%-38.54% |
| Max drawdown duration | EEMA FLAX | 16d20d | 55d57d | 242d247d | 1506d1480d |
Trading data
EEMA | FLAX | |
Last sale 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $120.59 | $38.74 |
| Previous close 06/18/2026 | $117.21 | $37.52 |
| Consolidated volume 06/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EEMA | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EEMA | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $120.59 | $38.74 |
| 1D performance | +2.88% | +3.25% |
| AuM | $1.33 B | $53.47 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.19% |
Characteristics
EEMA | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | MSCI EM Asia Custom Capped Index | FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 800 | 1327 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 8, 2012 | February 6, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EEMA
Taiwan
28.91%
Republic of Korea
19.95%
India
15.73%
China
15.18%
Cayman Islands
12.9%
Other
7.34%
FLAX
Taiwan
26.38%
Republic of Korea
20.97%
India
15.23%
Cayman Islands
12.93%
China
11.67%
Other
12.82%
Sectors
EEMA
Information Techn.
41.11%
Financials
15.01%
Consumer Discreti.
10.89%
Industrials
7.6%
Other
25.39%
FLAX
Information Techn.
39.72%
Financials
16.68%
Consumer Discreti.
10.17%
Industrials
7.74%
Other
25.7%
Advertisement
Diversification
EEMA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.67%
FLAX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.94%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
EEMA
TWN SEMICONT MAN
15.73%
SAMSUNG ELECTR
4.97%
SK HYNIX
4.68%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
2.90%
TENCENT HOLDINGS
2.71%
DELTA ELECTRONIC
1.45%
MEDIATEK INC
1.33%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK
1.16%
HDFC BANK
0.99%
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES
0.98%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY
0.94%
ICICI BANK
0.77%
PINDUODUO INC ADR
0.76%
XIAOMI CORP
0.68%
INDUSTRIAL COMMERC BK CHINA
0.63%
FLAX
TWN SEMICONT MAN
15.98%
SAMSUNG ELECTR
6.56%
SK HYNIX
4.32%
TENCENT HOLDINGS
3.45%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
2.71%
DELTA ELECTRONIC
1.12%
MEDIATEK INC
1.03%
AIA
1.00%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK
0.91%
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES
0.90%
HDFC BANK
0.87%
DBS GROUP HOLDINGS
0.81%
SAMSUNG ELEC-1P PRF
0.80%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY
0.79%
PINDUODUO INC ADR
0.69%
Frequently asked questions about EEMA and FLAX
How have the EEMA and FLAX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 18, 2026, EEMA is up 29.21% year-to-date (YTD), while FLAX has returned 29.43%. That puts FLAX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EEMA or FLAX?
Year-to-date, the EEMA ETF saw -$578M in flows, compared to +$6M for FLAX.
Which ETF is more volatile: EEMA or FLAX?
Over the past year, EEMA had a volatility of 20.02%, while FLAX experienced 20.98%.
Which ETF is bigger: EEMA or FLAX?
As of June 18, 2026, EEMA holds $1.33 B in assets under management (AUM), while FLAX manages $53.47 M.
What sectors do the EEMA and FLAX ETFs invest in?
EEMA leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, FLAX focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the EEMA ETF and FLAX ETF?
EEMA top holdings include TWN SEMICONT MAN, SAMSUNG ELECTR and SK HYNIX. FLAX holds in its top three: TWN SEMICONT MAN, SAMSUNG ELECTR and SK HYNIX.
Which ETF is more diversified: EEMA or FLAX?
EEMA holds 874 securities with 40.67% of its assets in the top 15. FLAX has 1445 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.94%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
