EEMAvsBKEMETF Comparison
VS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Industrials. EEMA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.11% for BKEM. EEMA is up 24.6% year-to-date (YTD) with -$960M in YTD flows. BKEM performs worse with 22.39% YTD performance, and +$31M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EEMA and BKEM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EEMA vs BKEM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EEMA BKEM | +1.68%+0.96% | -3.57%-4.17% | +24.60%+22.39% | +29.27%+27.63% | +88.74%+81.66% | +52.40%+50.98% |
| Flows | EEMA BKEM | +$24M+$19M | -$394M+$23M | -$960M+$31M | -$941M+$28M | -$216M-$23M | -$337M+$43M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EEMA BKEM | +23.66%+25.46% | +22.54%+23.35% | +18.40%+17.87% | +18.88%+17.64% |
| Max drawdown | EEMA BKEM | -12.50%-13.18% | -13.77%-13.25% | -18.37%-15.84% | -36.73%-31.99% |
| Max drawdown duration | EEMA BKEM | 88d88d | 55d57d | 242d245d | 1343d1325d |
Trading data
EEMA | BKEM | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $116.61 | $30.50 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $116.13 | $30.55 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EEMA | BKEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EEMA | BKEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $116.61 | $30.50 |
| 1D performance | +0.41% | -0.17% |
| AuM | $898.46 M | $110.27 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.11% |
Characteristics
EEMA | BKEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | BNY Mellon |
| Benchmark | MSCI EM Asia Custom Capped Index | Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 827 | 1584 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 8, 2012 | April 22, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EEMA
China
30.42%
Taiwan
29.13%
India
17.24%
Republic of Korea
15.1%
Other
8.11%
BKEM
Taiwan
25.82%
China
19.7%
Republic of Korea
19.58%
India
11.65%
Other
23.26%
Sectors
EEMA
Technology
41.9%
Finance
20.03%
Industrials
7.84%
Other
30.23%
BKEM
Technology
42.68%
Finance
20.26%
Industrials
7.04%
Other
30.01%
Advertisement
Diversification
EEMA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
37.31%
BKEM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
38.06%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
EEMA
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
14.58%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
3.98%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
3.96%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
2.61%
SK hynix, Inc.
2.40%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.67%
China Construction Bank Corp.
1.25%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
1.01%
HDFC Bank Ltd.
0.99%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
0.98%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
0.90%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
0.88%
Xiaomi Corp.
0.73%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
0.70%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
0.68%
BKEM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
13.72%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
6.33%
SK hynix, Inc.
5.50%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
2.76%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
2.01%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.33%
China Construction Bank Corp.
0.86%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
0.84%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
0.78%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
0.75%
International Holding Co. PJSC
0.69%
HDFC Bank Ltd.
0.69%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
0.62%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
0.62%
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
0.56%
Frequently asked questions about EEMA and BKEM
How have the EEMA and BKEM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 18, 2026, EEMA is up 24.6% year-to-date (YTD), while BKEM has returned 22.39%. That puts EEMA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EEMA or BKEM?
Year-to-date, the EEMA ETF saw -$960M in flows, compared to +$31M for BKEM.
Which ETF is more volatile: EEMA or BKEM?
Over the past year, EEMA had a volatility of 22.54%, while BKEM experienced 23.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: EEMA or BKEM?
As of September 18, 2026, EEMA holds $898.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while BKEM manages $110.27 M.
What sectors do the EEMA and BKEM ETFs invest in?
EEMA leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, BKEM focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the EEMA ETF and BKEM ETF?
EEMA top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Tencent Holdings Ltd. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. BKEM holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: EEMA or BKEM?
EEMA holds 878 securities with 37.31% of its assets in the top 15. BKEM has 1682 securities and a top 15 weight of 38.06%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
