ECNSvsKUREETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
This fund is part of
China Blended Cap
-0.48%
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. ECNS's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Technology and Industrials. In contrast, KURE's top sector exposures are Healthcare, Non-Energy Materials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ECNS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.79% for KURE. ECNS is down -20.28% year-to-date (YTD) with -$16M in YTD flows. KURE performs better with 1.46% YTD performance, and +$29M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ECNS and KURE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ECNS vs KURE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ECNS KURE | -6.27%-6.15% | -9.52%+0.93% | -20.28%+1.46% | -26.07%-7.21% | +17.21%+2.96% | -33.01%-40.16% |
| Flows | ECNS KURE | -$1M+$5M | -$1M+$8M | -$16M+$29M | -$23M+$16M | +$4M+$39M | +$23M-$12M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ECNS KURE | +16.89%+28.93% | +18.21%+28.10% | +24.66%+26.90% | +25.66%+27.57% |
| Max drawdown | ECNS KURE | -13.83%-10.67% | -28.44%-24.36% | -31.19%-31.17% | -55.69%-58.52% |
| Max drawdown duration | ECNS KURE | 78d21d | 244d259d | 390d619d | 1806d1801d |
Trading data
ECNS | KURE | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.07 | $17.68 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $25.93 | $17.67 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ECNS | KURE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ECNS | KURE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.07 | $17.68 |
| 1D performance | +0.54% | +0.06% |
| AuM | $57.03 M | $107.05 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.79% |
Characteristics
ECNS | KURE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | KraneShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI China Small Cap Index | MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index |
| N° of holdings | 231 | 40 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 28, 2010 | January 31, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ECNS
China
70.19%
Hong Kong
24.8%
Other
5.01%
KURE
China
83.71%
Switzerland
8.84%
Other
7.45%
Sectors
ECNS
Healthcare
21.31%
Technology
17.9%
Industrials
14.83%
Finance
11.17%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.64%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.97%
Other
16.18%
KURE
Healthcare
98.28%
Other
1.72%
Advertisement
Diversification
ECNS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.69%
KURE
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
67.43%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
ECNS
Kingdee International Software Group Co., Ltd.
1.97%
Zai Lab Ltd.
1.70%
Dongyue Group Ltd.
1.59%
Minth Group Ltd.
1.46%
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.
1.40%
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd.
1.40%
TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd.
1.35%
Meitu, Inc.
1.34%
China Ruyi Holdings Ltd.
1.27%
Lingbao Gold Group Co. Ltd.
1.27%
GCL Technology Holdings Ltd.
1.26%
Keymed Biosciences, Inc.
1.21%
Hesai Group
1.19%
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Ltd.
1.16%
JOYY, Inc.
1.10%
KURE
Innovent Biologics, Inc.
9.50%
BeOne Medicines Ltd.
8.84%
WuXi Biologics (Cayman), Inc.
7.35%
WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
5.60%
Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd.
4.68%
Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
4.55%
Akeso, Inc.
4.05%
Sino Biopharmaceutical Ltd.
3.69%
CSPC Pharmaceutical Group Ltd.
3.63%
WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
3.10%
Hansoh Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.
3.08%
Genscript Biotech Corp.
2.86%
Yunnan Baiyao Group Co., Ltd.
2.20%
3SBio, Inc.
2.15%
Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
2.15%
Frequently asked questions about ECNS and KURE
How have the ECNS and KURE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, ECNS is down -20.28% year-to-date (YTD), while KURE has returned 1.46%. That puts KURE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ECNS or KURE?
Year-to-date, the ECNS ETF saw -$16M in flows, compared to +$29M for KURE.
Which ETF is more volatile: ECNS or KURE?
Over the past year, ECNS had a volatility of 18.21%, while KURE experienced 28.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: ECNS or KURE?
As of October 27, 2026, ECNS holds $57.03 M in assets under management (AUM), while KURE manages $107.05 M.
What sectors do the ECNS and KURE ETFs invest in?
ECNS leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, KURE focuses on Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the ECNS ETF and KURE ETF?
ECNS top holdings include Kingdee International Software Group Co., Ltd., Zai Lab Ltd. and Dongyue Group Ltd.. KURE holds in its top three: Innovent Biologics, Inc., BeOne Medicines Ltd. and WuXi Biologics (Cayman), Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ECNS or KURE?
ECNS holds 231 securities with 20.69% of its assets in the top 15. KURE has 42 securities and a top 15 weight of 67.43%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
