ECNSvsGXCETF Comparison
VS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and State Street SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. ECNS's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Technology and Industrials. In contrast, GXC's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Both ECNS and GXC have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%. ECNS is down -20.28% year-to-date (YTD) with -$16M in YTD flows. GXC performs better with -16.73% YTD performance, and +$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ECNS and GXC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ECNS vs GXC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ECNS GXC | -6.27%-7.17% | -9.52%-9.60% | -20.28%-16.73% | -26.07%-21.35% | +17.21%+25.53% | -33.01%-19.84% |
| Flows | ECNS GXC | -$1M- | -$1M+$18M | -$16M+$19M | -$23M+$43M | +$4M-$407M | +$23M-$619M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ECNS GXC | +16.89%+14.60% | +18.21%+18.05% | +24.66%+22.29% | +25.66%+24.66% |
| Max drawdown | ECNS GXC | -13.83%-13.80% | -28.44%-22.75% | -31.19%-23.19% | -55.69%-46.69% |
| Max drawdown duration | ECNS GXC | 78d78d | 244d271d | 390d390d | 1806d1400d |
Trading data
ECNS | GXC | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.07 | $81.11 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $25.93 | $81.13 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ECNS | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ECNS | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.07 | $81.11 |
| 1D performance | +0.54% | -0.02% |
| AuM | $57.03 M | $423.15 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
ECNS | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI China Small Cap Index | S&P China BMI Index |
| N° of holdings | 231 | 1175 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 28, 2010 | March 20, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
ECNS
China
70.19%
Hong Kong
24.8%
Other
5.01%
GXC
China
87.99%
Other
12.01%
Sectors
ECNS
Healthcare
21.31%
Technology
17.9%
Industrials
14.83%
Finance
11.17%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.64%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.97%
Other
16.18%
GXC
Technology
24.28%
Finance
20.38%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
13.99%
Industrials
9.22%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.68%
Other
24.45%
Advertisement
Diversification
ECNS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.69%
GXC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
37.51%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
ECNS
Kingdee International Software Group Co., Ltd.
1.97%
Zai Lab Ltd.
1.70%
Dongyue Group Ltd.
1.59%
Minth Group Ltd.
1.46%
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.
1.40%
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd.
1.40%
TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd.
1.35%
Meitu, Inc.
1.34%
China Ruyi Holdings Ltd.
1.27%
Lingbao Gold Group Co. Ltd.
1.27%
GCL Technology Holdings Ltd.
1.26%
Keymed Biosciences, Inc.
1.21%
Hesai Group
1.19%
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Ltd.
1.16%
JOYY, Inc.
1.10%
GXC
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
9.88%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.86%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.42%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.14%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
1.85%
Xiaomi Corp.
1.73%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.71%
Meituan
1.60%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.33%
NetEase, Inc.
1.21%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.16%
JD.com, Inc.
1.14%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
0.85%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
0.84%
Baidu, Inc.
0.80%
Frequently asked questions about ECNS and GXC
How have the ECNS and GXC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, ECNS is down -20.28% year-to-date (YTD), while GXC has lost -16.73%. That puts GXC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ECNS or GXC?
Year-to-date, the ECNS ETF saw -$16M in flows, compared to +$19M for GXC.
Which ETF is more volatile: ECNS or GXC?
Over the past year, ECNS had a volatility of 18.21%, while GXC experienced 18.05%.
Which ETF is bigger: ECNS or GXC?
As of October 27, 2026, ECNS holds $57.03 M in assets under management (AUM), while GXC manages $423.15 M.
What sectors do the ECNS and GXC ETFs invest in?
ECNS leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, GXC focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the ECNS ETF and GXC ETF?
ECNS top holdings include Kingdee International Software Group Co., Ltd., Zai Lab Ltd. and Dongyue Group Ltd.. GXC holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: ECNS or GXC?
ECNS holds 231 securities with 20.69% of its assets in the top 15. GXC has 1238 securities and a top 15 weight of 37.51%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ECNS & GXC
Advertisement
