ECNSvsFLCHETF Comparison
VS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. ECNS's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Technology and Industrials. In contrast, FLCH's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ECNS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.19% for FLCH. ECNS is down -20.28% year-to-date (YTD) with -$16M in YTD flows. FLCH performs better with -18.06% YTD performance, and +$34M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ECNS and FLCH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ECNS vs FLCH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ECNS FLCH | -6.27%-6.69% | -9.52%-9.51% | -20.28%-18.06% | -26.07%-23.23% | +17.21%+26.58% | -33.01%-20.42% |
| Flows | ECNS FLCH | -$1M-$33M | -$1M-$6M | -$16M+$34M | -$23M+$82M | +$4M+$150M | +$23M+$176M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ECNS FLCH | +16.89%+15.18% | +18.21%+18.89% | +24.66%+23.10% | +25.66%+26.33% |
| Max drawdown | ECNS FLCH | -13.83%-13.83% | -28.44%-23.82% | -31.19%-25.17% | -55.69%-48.70% |
| Max drawdown duration | ECNS FLCH | 78d78d | 244d271d | 390d390d | 1806d1395d |
Trading data
ECNS | FLCH | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.07 | $19.46 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $25.93 | $19.52 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ECNS | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ECNS | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.07 | $19.46 |
| 1D performance | +0.54% | -0.31% |
| AuM | $57.03 M | $252.21 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.19% |
Characteristics
ECNS | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | MSCI China Small Cap Index | FTSE China RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 231 | 893 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 28, 2010 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ECNS
China
70.19%
Hong Kong
24.8%
Other
5.01%
FLCH
China
91.11%
Other
8.89%
Sectors
ECNS
Healthcare
21.31%
Technology
17.9%
Industrials
14.83%
Finance
11.17%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.64%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.97%
Other
16.18%
FLCH
Technology
24.35%
Finance
21.84%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
16.22%
Industrials
7.57%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.14%
Other
22.88%
Advertisement
Diversification
ECNS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.69%
FLCH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.7%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
ECNS
Kingdee International Software Group Co., Ltd.
1.97%
Zai Lab Ltd.
1.70%
Dongyue Group Ltd.
1.59%
Minth Group Ltd.
1.46%
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.
1.40%
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd.
1.40%
TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd.
1.35%
Meitu, Inc.
1.34%
China Ruyi Holdings Ltd.
1.27%
Lingbao Gold Group Co. Ltd.
1.27%
GCL Technology Holdings Ltd.
1.26%
Keymed Biosciences, Inc.
1.21%
Hesai Group
1.19%
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Ltd.
1.16%
JOYY, Inc.
1.10%
FLCH
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
12.44%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
9.88%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.64%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.69%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
2.34%
Xiaomi Corp.
2.20%
Meituan
1.92%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.68%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.67%
NetEase, Inc.
1.59%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.54%
JD.com, Inc.
1.25%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
0.97%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
0.97%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
0.92%
Frequently asked questions about ECNS and FLCH
How have the ECNS and FLCH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, ECNS is down -20.28% year-to-date (YTD), while FLCH has lost -18.06%. That puts FLCH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ECNS or FLCH?
Year-to-date, the ECNS ETF saw -$16M in flows, compared to +$34M for FLCH.
Which ETF is more volatile: ECNS or FLCH?
Over the past year, ECNS had a volatility of 18.21%, while FLCH experienced 18.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: ECNS or FLCH?
As of October 27, 2026, ECNS holds $57.03 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLCH manages $252.21 M.
What sectors do the ECNS and FLCH ETFs invest in?
ECNS leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, FLCH focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the ECNS ETF and FLCH ETF?
ECNS top holdings include Kingdee International Software Group Co., Ltd., Zai Lab Ltd. and Dongyue Group Ltd.. FLCH holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: ECNS or FLCH?
ECNS holds 231 securities with 20.69% of its assets in the top 15. FLCH has 998 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.7%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
