ECMLvsIWDETF Comparison
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Value. In contrast, IWD's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ECML is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.95%, versus 0.18% for IWD. ECML is up 20.84% year-to-date (YTD) with -$31M in YTD flows. IWD performs better with 24.32% YTD performance, and -$2.26B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ECML and IWD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ECML vs IWD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ECML IWD | +2.89%+4.37% | +0.75%+3.60% | +20.84%+24.32% | +25.75%+28.94% | +58.98%+88.13% | n/a+71.99% |
| Flows | ECML IWD | -$1M-$1.23B | -$2M-$922M | -$31M-$2.26B | -$33M+$741M | -$79M+$565M | --$3.80B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ECML IWD | +10.94%+8.34% | +13.00%+11.11% | +17.67%+12.91% | n/a+14.75% |
| Max drawdown | ECML IWD | -7.56%-4.09% | -7.56%-6.81% | -24.46%-15.64% | n/a-19.11% |
| Max drawdown duration | ECML IWD | 68d48d | 68d43d | 413d213d | n/a700d |
ECML | IWD | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 7:59 PM | $40.31 | $259.37 |
| Previous close 10/30/2026 | $40.30 | $258.65 |
| Consolidated volume 10/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ECML | IWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ECML | IWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.31 | $259.37 |
| 1D performance | +0.02% | +0.28% |
| AuM | $124.45 M | $83.22 B |
| E/R | 0.95% | 0.18% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
