Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ECMLvsBSMCETF Comparison
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) belongs to the US Large Cap Value segment. Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. ECML's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, BSMC's top sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. ECML is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.95%, versus 0.71% for BSMC. ECML is up 5.52% year-to-date (YTD) with -$367K in YTD flows. BSMC performs better with 5.79% YTD performance, and +$8M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ECML and BSMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ECML vs BSMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ECML BSMC | -5.25%-4.04% | +3.13%+4.93% | +5.52%+5.79% | +20.30%+24.39% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | ECML BSMC | -$367K+$5M | -$367K+$17M | -$367K+$8M | -$40M+$38M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ECML BSMC | +13.92%+13.18% | +19.28%+18.47% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | ECML BSMC | -5.61%-5.10% | -12.84%-13.89% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ECML BSMC | 23d10d | 47d51d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
ECML | BSMC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.22 | $35.66 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $35.36 | $35.75 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
ECML | BSMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.22 | $35.66 |
| 1D performance | -0.38% | -0.26% |
| AuM | $137.21 M | $156.83 M |
| E/R | 0.95% | 0.71% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ECML and BSMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, ECML is up 5.52% year-to-date (YTD), while BSMC has returned 5.79%. That puts BSMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ECML or BSMC?
Year-to-date, the ECML ETF saw -$367K in flows, compared to +$8M for BSMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: ECML or BSMC?
Over the past year, ECML had a volatility of 19.28%, while BSMC experienced 18.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: ECML or BSMC?
As of March 13, 2026, ECML holds $137.21 M in assets under management (AUM), while BSMC manages $156.83 M.
What sectors do the ECML and BSMC ETFs invest in?
ECML leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, BSMC focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the ECML ETF and BSMC ETF?
ECML top holdings include MUELLER INDUSTRIES, NEWMONT CORP and ALCOA CORP. BSMC holds in its top three: IPG PHOTONICS, DRIL QUIP and ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: ECML or BSMC?
ECML holds 63 securities with 34.76% of its assets in the top 15. BSMC has 60 securities and a top 15 weight of 38.07%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
