Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EBITvsDGRSETF Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF (EBIT) belongs to the US Small Cap segment. WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. EBIT's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. In contrast, DGRS's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. EBIT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.38% for DGRS. EBIT is up 3.93% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. DGRS performs better with 5.43% YTD performance, and +$196K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EBIT and DGRS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EBIT vs DGRS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EBIT DGRS | -5.45%-5.82% | -0.07%+2.39% | +3.93%+5.43% | +20.27%+14.94% | n/a+38.39% | n/a+23.64% |
| Flows | EBIT DGRS | +$2M+$6M | +$2M-$4M | +$2M+$196K | +$931K-$90M | -+$66M | -+$133M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EBIT DGRS | +15.95%+16.80% | +22.24%+22.68% | n/a+20.38% | n/a+20.67% |
| Max drawdown | EBIT DGRS | -5.52%-7.30% | -14.95%-14.81% | n/a-27.66% | n/a-27.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | EBIT DGRS | 17d31d | 46d98d | n/a435d | n/a435d |
EBIT | DGRS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.35 | $52.14 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $34.38 | $52.24 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EBIT | DGRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EBIT | DGRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.35 | $52.14 |
| 1D performance | -0.07% | -0.19% |
| AuM | $11.34 M | $358.27 M |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.38% |
EBIT | DGRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Harbor Capital | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners Index | WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 612 | 195 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 10, 2024 | July 25, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EBIT and DGRS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, EBIT is up 3.93% year-to-date (YTD), while DGRS has returned 5.43%. That puts DGRS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EBIT or DGRS?
Year-to-date, the EBIT ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$196K for DGRS.
Which ETF is more volatile: EBIT or DGRS?
Over the past year, EBIT had a volatility of 22.24%, while DGRS experienced 22.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: EBIT or DGRS?
As of March 11, 2026, EBIT holds $11.34 M in assets under management (AUM), while DGRS manages $358.27 M.
What sectors do the EBIT and DGRS ETFs invest in?
EBIT leans toward sectors like Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. Meanwhile, DGRS focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the EBIT ETF and DGRS ETF?
EBIT top holdings include NAVIENT CORPORATION COM, STONEX GROUP INC and JOHN WILEY SONS. DGRS holds in its top three: ARCHROCK, CAL MAINE FOODS and CALIFORNIA RESOURCES.
Which ETF is more diversified: EBIT or DGRS?
EBIT holds 618 securities with 10.19% of its assets in the top 15. DGRS has 202 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.62%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
