Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EBITvsACSVETF Comparison
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF (EBIT) belongs to the US Small Cap segment. American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) is part of the US Small Cap Value segment. EBIT's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. In contrast, ACSV's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. EBIT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.49% for ACSV. EBIT is up 4.89% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. ACSV performs worse with 4.79% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EBIT and ACSV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EBIT vs ACSV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EBIT ACSV | -4.37%-4.29% | +4.00%+4.87% | +4.89%+4.79% | +20.84%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | EBIT ACSV | +$2M+$1M | +$2M+$2M | +$2M+$2M | +$931K- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EBIT ACSV | +16.56%+16.34% | +22.28%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | EBIT ACSV | -4.66%-4.63% | -14.95%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | EBIT ACSV | 15d15d | 46dn/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
EBIT | ACSV | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.89 | $42.41 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $35.02 | $42.34 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EBIT | ACSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EBIT | ACSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.89 | $42.41 |
| 1D performance | -0.36% | +0.17% |
| AuM | $11.44 M | $9.07 M |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.49% |
EBIT | ACSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Harbor Capital | American Century Investments |
| Benchmark | Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 612 | 172 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 10, 2024 | October 14, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EBIT and ACSV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, EBIT is up 4.89% year-to-date (YTD), while ACSV has returned 4.79%. That puts EBIT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EBIT or ACSV?
Year-to-date, the EBIT ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$2M for ACSV.
Which ETF is bigger: EBIT or ACSV?
As of March 9, 2026, EBIT holds $11.44 M in assets under management (AUM), while ACSV manages $9.07 M.
What sectors do the EBIT and ACSV ETFs invest in?
EBIT leans toward sectors like Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. Meanwhile, ACSV focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the EBIT ETF and ACSV ETF?
EBIT top holdings include NAVIENT CORPORATION COM, STONEX GROUP INC and JOHN WILEY SONS. ACSV holds in its top three: OLD NATL BANCORP, PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES and MERITAGE HOMES.
Which ETF is more diversified: EBIT or ACSV?
EBIT holds 618 securities with 10.19% of its assets in the top 15. ACSV has 173 securities and a top 15 weight of 25.99%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
