Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EAFGvsSCHFETF Comparison
Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (EAFG) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EAFG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Materials and Industrials. In contrast, SCHF's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. EAFG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.03% for SCHF. EAFG is up 3.62% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. SCHF performs better with 5.13% YTD performance, and +$862M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EAFG and SCHF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EAFG vs SCHF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EAFG SCHF | -4.29%-4.11% | +4.82%+6.85% | +3.62%+5.13% | +25.01%+32.13% | n/a+66.35% | n/a+57.47% |
| Flows | EAFG SCHF | -+$486M | -+$2.35B | -+$862M | +$2M+$3.76B | -+$11.19B | -+$18.82B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EAFG SCHF | +16.82%+14.98% | +16.50%+15.54% | n/a+13.39% | n/a+14.44% |
| Max drawdown | EAFG SCHF | -7.69%-8.50% | -14.56%-13.56% | n/a-13.58% | n/a-28.95% |
| Max drawdown duration | EAFG SCHF | 10d10d | 41d41d | n/a211d | n/a897d |
EAFG | SCHF | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.35 | $24.89 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $24.46 | $25.38 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EAFG | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EAFG | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.35 | $24.89 |
| 1D performance | -0.45% | -1.93% |
| AuM | $3.04 M | $59.06 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.03% |
EAFG | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index | FTSE Developed ex US Index |
| N° of holdings | 96 | 1360 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 20, 2024 | November 3, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EAFG and SCHF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, EAFG is up 3.62% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHF has returned 5.13%. That puts SCHF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EAFG or SCHF?
Year-to-date, the EAFG ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$862M for SCHF.
Which ETF is more volatile: EAFG or SCHF?
Over the past year, EAFG had a volatility of 16.5%, while SCHF experienced 15.54%.
Which ETF is bigger: EAFG or SCHF?
As of March 11, 2026, EAFG holds $3.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCHF manages $59.06 B.
What sectors do the EAFG and SCHF ETFs invest in?
EAFG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Materials and Industrials. Meanwhile, SCHF focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the EAFG ETF and SCHF ETF?
EAFG top holdings include FRESNILLO PLC, ADVANTEST and EVOLUTION MINING. SCHF holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, SAMSUNG ELECTR and ROCHE.
Which ETF is more diversified: EAFG or SCHF?
EAFG holds 100 securities with 43.65% of its assets in the top 15. SCHF has 1431 securities and a top 15 weight of 15.85%.
Should you add international equities to your investment portfolio?
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
