DWAWvsCRBNETF Comparison
ETF 1
DWAW
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World Equity ETF
This fund is part of
Multi-Asset: Other
-0.21%
VS
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World Equity ETF (DWAW) belongs to the Multi-Asset: Other segment. iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Industrials. DWAW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.23%, versus 0.2% for CRBN. DWAW is up 12.16% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. CRBN performs worse with 9.17% YTD performance, and +$49M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DWAW and CRBN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
DWAW vs CRBN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DWAW CRBN | -2.52%-0.56% | +5.47%+3.17% | +12.16%+9.17% | +20.42%+19.42% | +56.40%+66.14% | +48.76%+69.03% |
| Flows | DWAW CRBN | -$2M- | -$3M+$26M | -$3M+$49M | -$5M-$65M | -$29M-$199M | -$79M-$58M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DWAW CRBN | +20.77%+15.04% | +17.19%+13.74% | +18.69%+14.37% | +19.16%+16.02% |
| Max drawdown | DWAW CRBN | -5.02%-4.72% | -11.61%-10.24% | -22.80%-16.48% | -27.85%-26.92% |
| Max drawdown duration | DWAW CRBN | 10d45d | 50d50d | 246d87d | 914d752d |
Trading data
DWAW | CRBN | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $49.50 | $249.85 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $49.88 | $251.97 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
DWAW
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexDWAW | CRBN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
DWAW | CRBN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.50 | $249.85 |
| 1D performance | -0.76% | -0.84% |
| AuM | $90.83 M | $1.12 B |
| E/R | 1.23% | 0.2% |
Characteristics
DWAW | CRBN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index |
| N° of holdings | 1569 | 1070 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 26, 2019 | December 8, 2014 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
DWAW
USA
41.11%
Japan
9.91%
Other
48.97%
CRBN
USA
62.21%
Other
37.79%
Sectors
DWAW
Technology
33.43%
Finance
19.09%
Industrials
9.15%
Other
38.33%
CRBN
Technology
38.32%
Finance
20.23%
Industrials
8.56%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.05%
Healthcare
7.61%
Other
17.23%
Advertisement
Diversification
DWAW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.55%
CRBN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.8%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
DWAW
Micron Technology, Inc.
5.10%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
3.02%
Microsoft Corp.
1.32%
Apple, Inc.
1.27%
NVIDIA Corp.
1.17%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.10%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
1.08%
ASML Holding NV
0.92%
SK hynix, Inc.
0.86%
General Motors Co.
0.85%
HSBC Holdings Plc
0.84%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.80%
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
0.75%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
0.74%
Lam Research Corp.
0.72%
CRBN
NVIDIA Corp.
4.74%
Apple, Inc.
4.50%
Microsoft Corp.
3.10%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.57%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.29%
Broadcom Inc.
1.97%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.84%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.58%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.35%
Tesla, Inc.
1.25%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.09%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
0.96%
SK hynix, Inc.
0.87%
Eli Lilly & Co.
0.86%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.83%
Frequently asked questions about DWAW and CRBN
How have the DWAW and CRBN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, DWAW is up 12.16% year-to-date (YTD), while CRBN has returned 9.17%. That puts DWAW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DWAW or CRBN?
Year-to-date, the DWAW ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to +$49M for CRBN.
Which ETF is more volatile: DWAW or CRBN?
Over the past year, DWAW had a volatility of 17.19%, while CRBN experienced 13.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: DWAW or CRBN?
As of July 17, 2026, DWAW holds $90.83 M in assets under management (AUM), while CRBN manages $1.12 B.
What sectors do the DWAW and CRBN ETFs invest in?
DWAW leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, CRBN focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the DWAW ETF and CRBN ETF?
DWAW top holdings include Micron Technology, Inc., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Microsoft Corp.. CRBN holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: DWAW or CRBN?
DWAW holds 1630 securities with 20.55% of its assets in the top 15. CRBN has 1077 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.8%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
