Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DIHPvsGSIEETF Comparison
Dimensional International High Profitability ETF
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
Dimensional International High Profitability ETF (DIHP) belongs to the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. DIHP's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. In contrast, GSIE's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. DIHP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.28%, versus 0.25% for GSIE. DIHP is up 4.52% year-to-date (YTD) with +$209M in YTD flows. GSIE performs worse with 2.19% YTD performance, and +$216M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DIHP and GSIE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DIHP vs GSIE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DIHP GSIE | -3.95%-4.88% | +5.31%+3.54% | +4.52%+2.19% | +24.73%+25.73% | +52.48%+60.66% | n/a+53.41% |
| Flows | DIHP GSIE | +$91M+$41M | +$237M+$216M | +$209M+$216M | +$1.17B+$625M | +$3.44B+$711M | -+$1.79B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DIHP GSIE | +12.38%+13.10% | +13.77%+14.72% | +12.69%+12.87% | n/a+14.16% |
| Max drawdown | DIHP GSIE | -7.01%-7.37% | -12.61%-13.08% | -13.25%-13.08% | n/a-29.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | DIHP GSIE | 10d10d | 42d37d | 214d37d | n/a911d |
DIHP | GSIE | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.36 | $42.84 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $32.71 | $43.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DIHP | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DIHP | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.36 | $42.84 |
| 1D performance | -1.07% | -1.11% |
| AuM | $5.49 B | $5.20 B |
| E/R | 0.28% | 0.25% |
DIHP | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Dimensional | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 433 | 598 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 23, 2022 | November 6, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DIHP and GSIE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, DIHP is up 4.52% year-to-date (YTD), while GSIE has returned 2.19%. That puts DIHP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DIHP or GSIE?
Year-to-date, the DIHP ETF saw +$209M in flows, compared to +$216M for GSIE.
Which ETF is more volatile: DIHP or GSIE?
Over the past year, DIHP had a volatility of 13.77%, while GSIE experienced 14.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: DIHP or GSIE?
As of March 11, 2026, DIHP holds $5.49 B in assets under management (AUM), while GSIE manages $5.20 B.
What sectors do the DIHP and GSIE ETFs invest in?
DIHP leans toward sectors like Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. Meanwhile, GSIE focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the DIHP ETF and GSIE ETF?
DIHP top holdings include ROCHE, USN070592100 and NESTLE SA. GSIE holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and NOVARTIS.
Which ETF is more diversified: DIHP or GSIE?
DIHP holds 464 securities with 23.51% of its assets in the top 15. GSIE has 629 securities and a top 15 weight of 12.67%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
