Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DIHPvsGSIDETF Comparison
Dimensional International High Profitability ETF
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF
Dimensional International High Profitability ETF (DIHP) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. DIHP's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. In contrast, GSID's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. DIHP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.28%, versus 0.25% for GSID. DIHP is up 4.52% year-to-date (YTD) with +$209M in YTD flows. GSID performs worse with 3.03% YTD performance, and -$80M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DIHP and GSID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DIHP vs GSID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DIHP GSID | -3.95%-5.31% | +5.31%+4.36% | +4.52%+3.03% | +24.73%+25.11% | +52.48%+58.79% | n/a+51.18% |
| Flows | DIHP GSID | +$91M- | +$237M-$87M | +$209M-$80M | +$1.17B-$100M | +$3.44B+$218M | -+$321M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DIHP GSID | +12.38%+14.35% | +13.77%+16.12% | +12.69%+13.78% | n/a+15.13% |
| Max drawdown | DIHP GSID | -7.01%-8.10% | -12.61%-14.37% | -13.25%-14.37% | n/a-29.33% |
| Max drawdown duration | DIHP GSID | 10d10d | 42d42d | 214d42d | n/a897d |
DIHP | GSID | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.36 | $69.58 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $32.71 | $70.57 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DIHP | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DIHP | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.36 | $69.58 |
| 1D performance | -1.07% | -1.40% |
| AuM | $5.49 B | $907.97 M |
| E/R | 0.28% | 0.25% |
DIHP | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Dimensional | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 433 | 841 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 23, 2022 | May 12, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DIHP and GSID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, DIHP is up 4.52% year-to-date (YTD), while GSID has returned 3.03%. That puts DIHP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DIHP or GSID?
Year-to-date, the DIHP ETF saw +$209M in flows, compared to -$80M for GSID.
Which ETF is more volatile: DIHP or GSID?
Over the past year, DIHP had a volatility of 13.77%, while GSID experienced 16.12%.
Which ETF is bigger: DIHP or GSID?
As of March 11, 2026, DIHP holds $5.49 B in assets under management (AUM), while GSID manages $907.97 M.
What sectors do the DIHP and GSID ETFs invest in?
DIHP leans toward sectors like Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. Meanwhile, GSID focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the DIHP ETF and GSID ETF?
DIHP top holdings include ROCHE, USN070592100 and NESTLE SA. GSID holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: DIHP or GSID?
DIHP holds 464 securities with 23.51% of its assets in the top 15. GSID has 889 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.33%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.