Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DIHPvsCEFAETF Comparison
Dimensional International High Profitability ETF
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF
Dimensional International High Profitability ETF (DIHP) and Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. DIHP's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. In contrast, CEFA's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. DIHP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.28%, versus 0.35% for CEFA. DIHP is up 4.52% year-to-date (YTD) with +$209M in YTD flows. CEFA performs worse with -0.24% YTD performance, and +$11M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DIHP and CEFA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DIHP vs CEFA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DIHP CEFA | -3.95%-7.15% | +5.31%-0.06% | +4.52%-0.24% | +24.73%+18.92% | +52.48%+49.26% | n/a+36.15% |
| Flows | DIHP CEFA | +$91M+$9M | +$237M+$12M | +$209M+$11M | +$1.17B+$18M | +$3.44B+$21M | -+$32M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DIHP CEFA | +12.38%+15.27% | +13.77%+16.38% | +12.69%+14.04% | n/a+15.62% |
| Max drawdown | DIHP CEFA | -7.01%-8.69% | -12.61%-14.08% | -13.25%-14.76% | n/a-31.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | DIHP CEFA | 10d12d | 42d42d | 214d214d | n/a905d |
DIHP | CEFA | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.36 | $36.67 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $32.71 | $37.15 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DIHP | CEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DIHP | CEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.36 | $36.67 |
| 1D performance | -1.07% | -1.28% |
| AuM | $5.49 B | $40.13 M |
| E/R | 0.28% | 0.35% |
DIHP | CEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Dimensional | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | S&P Developed ex-U.S. Catholic Values Index |
| N° of holdings | 433 | 339 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 23, 2022 | June 22, 2020 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DIHP and CEFA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, DIHP is up 4.52% year-to-date (YTD), while CEFA has lost -0.24%. That puts DIHP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DIHP or CEFA?
Year-to-date, the DIHP ETF saw +$209M in flows, compared to +$11M for CEFA.
Which ETF is more volatile: DIHP or CEFA?
Over the past year, DIHP had a volatility of 13.77%, while CEFA experienced 16.38%.
Which ETF is bigger: DIHP or CEFA?
As of March 11, 2026, DIHP holds $5.49 B in assets under management (AUM), while CEFA manages $40.13 M.
What sectors do the DIHP and CEFA ETFs invest in?
DIHP leans toward sectors like Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. Meanwhile, CEFA focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the DIHP ETF and CEFA ETF?
DIHP top holdings include ROCHE, USN070592100 and NESTLE SA. CEFA holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ESSILORLUXOTTICA and SIEMENS.
Which ETF is more diversified: DIHP or CEFA?
DIHP holds 464 securities with 23.51% of its assets in the top 15. CEFA has 358 securities and a top 15 weight of 22.09%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.