Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DFVXvsQARPETF Comparison
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. DFVX's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Industrials. In contrast, QARP's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. DFVX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.22%, versus 0.19% for QARP. DFVX is up 2.7% year-to-date (YTD) with +$12M in YTD flows. QARP performs better with 2.99% YTD performance, and -$12M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DFVX and QARP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DFVX vs QARP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DFVX QARP | -2.44%-1.92% | +2.33%+2.92% | +2.70%+2.99% | +19.35%+18.54% | n/a+70.41% | n/a+79.83% |
| Flows | DFVX QARP | +$8M-$9M | +$12M-$12M | +$12M-$12M | -$12M+$31K | -+$33M | --$6M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DFVX QARP | +10.59%+9.75% | +16.56%+15.73% | n/a+12.84% | n/a+15.55% |
| Max drawdown | DFVX QARP | -2.99%-3.05% | -12.45%-11.48% | n/a-15.60% | n/a-22.70% |
| Max drawdown duration | DFVX QARP | 29d13d | 45d45d | n/a155d | n/a572d |
DFVX | QARP | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 2:08 PM | $75.79 | $60.71 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $76.31 | $60.75 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DFVX | QARP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DFVX | QARP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $75.79 | $60.71 |
| 1D performance | -0.68% | -0.06% |
| AuM | $450.35 M | $71.43 M |
| E/R | 0.22% | 0.19% |
DFVX | QARP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Dimensional | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 309 | 914 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 2, 2023 | April 15, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DFVX and QARP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, DFVX is up 2.7% year-to-date (YTD), while QARP has returned 2.99%. That puts QARP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DFVX or QARP?
Year-to-date, the DFVX ETF saw +$12M in flows, compared to -$12M for QARP.
Which ETF is more volatile: DFVX or QARP?
Over the past year, DFVX had a volatility of 16.56%, while QARP experienced 15.73%.
Which ETF is bigger: DFVX or QARP?
As of March 10, 2026, DFVX holds $450.35 M in assets under management (AUM), while QARP manages $71.43 M.
What sectors do the DFVX and QARP ETFs invest in?
DFVX leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Industrials. Meanwhile, QARP focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the DFVX ETF and QARP ETF?
DFVX top holdings include AMAZON.COM INC, MICROSOFT-T and META PLATFORMS. QARP holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and AMAZON.COM INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: DFVX or QARP?
DFVX holds 321 securities with 37.52% of its assets in the top 15. QARP has 1008 securities and a top 15 weight of 47.72%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
