Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DFUSvsIWVETF Comparison
Dimensional US Equity ETF (DFUS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) is part of the US All Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. DFUS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%, versus 0.2% for IWV. DFUS is down -0.77% year-to-date (YTD) with +$810M in YTD flows. IWV performs worse with -2.22% YTD performance, and -$604M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DFUS and IWV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DFUS vs IWV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DFUS IWV | -2.52%-2.42% | -1.76%-2.16% | -0.77%-2.22% | +23.52%+20.33% | +81.53%+76.55% | n/a+69.20% |
| Flows | DFUS IWV | +$744M-$684M | +$888M-$565M | +$810M-$604M | +$2.51B+$49M | +$7.55B+$21M | --$115M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DFUS IWV | +12.12%+12.31% | +18.63%+18.57% | +15.31%+15.15% | n/a+17.27% |
| Max drawdown | DFUS IWV | -3.52%-4.45% | -14.06%-14.04% | -19.45%-19.32% | n/a-25.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | DFUS IWV | 43d44d | 45d45d | 127d127d | n/a711d |
DFUS | IWV | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $71.98 | $376.11 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $72.39 | $378.23 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DFUS | IWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DFUS | IWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.98 | $376.11 |
| 1D performance | -0.57% | -0.56% |
| AuM | $18.81 B | $17.30 B |
| E/R | 0.09% | 0.2% |
DFUS | IWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Dimensional | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 3000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 2132 | 2301 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 14, 2021 | May 22, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DFUS and IWV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, DFUS is down -0.77% year-to-date (YTD), while IWV has lost -2.22%. That puts DFUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DFUS or IWV?
Year-to-date, the DFUS ETF saw +$810M in flows, compared to -$604M for IWV.
Which ETF is more volatile: DFUS or IWV?
Over the past year, DFUS had a volatility of 18.63%, while IWV experienced 18.57%.
Which ETF is bigger: DFUS or IWV?
As of March 11, 2026, DFUS holds $18.81 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWV manages $17.30 B.
What sectors do the DFUS and IWV ETFs invest in?
DFUS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IWV focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the DFUS ETF and IWV ETF?
DFUS top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. IWV holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: DFUS or IWV?
DFUS holds 2202 securities with 40.29% of its assets in the top 15. IWV has 2588 securities and a top 15 weight of 38.69%.
The Cheapest Active ETFs of 2025
Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Divergence Between Chinese and US Markets
Dimensional Fund Advisors Celebrates 3-Year ETF Anniversary
The Cheapest NYSE Listed Actively Managed Equity and Fixed Income ETFs of 2023
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.