DFUSvsIWBETF Comparison
VS
Dimensional US Equity ETF (DFUS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. DFUS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%, versus 0.15% for IWB. DFUS is up 13.17% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.22B in YTD flows. IWB performs better with 13.39% YTD performance, and -$2.80B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DFUS and IWB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
DFUS vs IWB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/26/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DFUS IWB | -0.10%+0.66% | +3.37%+4.17% | +13.17%+13.39% | +12.87%+12.96% | +92.27%+93.10% | +76.28%+75.20% |
| Flows | DFUS IWB | +$311M-$104M | +$386M-$660M | +$1.22B-$2.80B | +$1.36B-$1.07B | +$7.54B-$2.81B | +$8.64B-$2.80B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DFUS IWB | +11.60%+11.25% | +13.15%+12.85% | +15.36%+15.10% | +17.44%+17.29% |
| Max drawdown | DFUS IWB | -3.34%-3.22% | -8.95%-8.86% | -19.45%-19.16% | -24.67%-25.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | DFUS IWB | 53d53d | 76d76d | 127d126d | 708d709d |
Trading data
DFUS | IWB | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $84.17 | $421.72 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $83.87 | $420.41 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
DFUS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexDFUS | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
DFUS | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $84.17 | $421.72 |
| 1D performance | +0.36% | +0.31% |
| AuM | $21.69 B | $48.98 B |
| E/R | 0.09% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
DFUS | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Dimensional | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 1000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 2193 | 1007 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 14, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
DFUS
USA
97.22%
Other
2.78%
IWB
USA
97.62%
Other
2.38%
Sectors
DFUS
Technology
43.19%
Finance
12.87%
Healthcare
9.55%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.73%
Industrials
8.43%
Other
17.23%
IWB
Technology
42.97%
Finance
14.31%
Healthcare
9.34%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.59%
Industrials
8.08%
Other
16.72%
Advertisement
Diversification
DFUS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.95%
IWB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.83%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
DFUS
NVIDIA Corp.
7.24%
Apple, Inc.
6.45%
Microsoft Corp.
5.32%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.58%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.79%
Broadcom Inc.
2.44%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.27%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.79%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.54%
Tesla, Inc.
1.52%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.35%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.33%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.31%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.08%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.94%
IWB
NVIDIA Corp.
7.26%
Apple, Inc.
6.45%
Microsoft Corp.
5.31%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.55%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.79%
Broadcom Inc.
2.43%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.25%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.77%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.52%
Tesla, Inc.
1.51%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.34%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.32%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.30%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.08%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.94%
Frequently asked questions about DFUS and IWB
How have the DFUS and IWB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 26, 2026, DFUS is up 13.17% year-to-date (YTD), while IWB has returned 13.39%. That puts IWB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DFUS or IWB?
Year-to-date, the DFUS ETF saw +$1.22B in flows, compared to -$2.80B for IWB.
Which ETF is more volatile: DFUS or IWB?
Over the past year, DFUS had a volatility of 13.15%, while IWB experienced 12.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: DFUS or IWB?
As of October 26, 2026, DFUS holds $21.69 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWB manages $48.98 B.
What sectors do the DFUS and IWB ETFs invest in?
DFUS leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, IWB focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the DFUS ETF and IWB ETF?
DFUS top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. IWB holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: DFUS or IWB?
DFUS holds 2230 securities with 40.95% of its assets in the top 15. IWB has 1018 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.83%.
Advertisement
Latest news about DFUS & IWB
The Cheapest Active ETFs of 2025
February 25, 2025
DFUS
Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Divergence Between Chinese and US Markets
February 19, 2024
DFUS
Dimensional Fund Advisors Celebrates 3-Year ETF Anniversary
November 8, 2023
DFUS
The Cheapest NYSE Listed Actively Managed Equity and Fixed Income ETFs of 2023
October 25, 2023
DFUS
Advertisement
Advertisement
